#稳定币支付 After reviewing this stress test analysis of the 2026 World Cup prediction market, what I'm most focused on is actually the stablecoin payment infrastructure — because this directly determines the actual yield extraction efficiency for copy trading.

The current situation is clear: Visa has already launched a USDC on-chain settlement pilot in December, but the ECB is warning about the risks of private stablecoins. What does this mean? By 2026, copy traders will likely face a bifurcated landscape — deposit and withdrawal flows on US-based platforms will become smoother, but settlement friction in Europe and other restricted regions may actually increase.

My assessment is that when selecting copy trading targets, you need to place greater emphasis on the platform's payment infrastructure. Platforms that have already unlocked stablecoin channels (especially those integrated with mainstream players like Visa for settlement) shouldn't experience withdrawal delays or fund bottlenecks during World Cup peak periods. Conversely, platforms still relying on traditional banking channels will face withdrawal speed as a bottleneck when hit by peak transaction volumes.

This isn't just a convenience issue — for copy trading, the complete risk management loop includes timely stop-losses and rapid liquidation. If settlement infrastructure is inadequate, even if you follow the right experts, profits only exist on paper; actual cash can't reach your hands. So now I'm examining the collaboration depth between mainstream sports betting platforms already in the game (DraftKings, FanDuel) and stablecoin-integrated exchanges. Whoever has smoother connections will be more stable under extreme load conditions.

Practice is the best teacher. For the next round of selecting quality copy trading targets, regulatory compliance + payment infrastructure — both must be solid simultaneously.