#比特币价格走势 VanEck's assessment is interesting — Bitcoin lagged the Nasdaq by 50% this year, yet this is being interpreted as a signal for a reversal next year. From a copy-trading perspective, such viewpoints are indeed worth considering.

The key lies in how you interpret this "misalignment." If it's simply based on technical rebound theory, the reference value is limited. However, the combination of currency depreciation and liquidity return that Schassler mentioned is indeed a core driver that has historically pushed Bitcoin upward. The question is: can these conditions actually occur simultaneously in 2026?

My observation is that some traders in the market are already positioning ahead of this expectation. When split-staking copy-trading, some are beginning to increase their allocation weights toward macro traders, especially those who are simultaneously bullish on precious metals and digital assets. This style of trader does have a decent historical win rate, but volatility is also high — requiring sufficient psychological preparation and disciplined stop-loss execution.

The current question is how to participate. If your risk preference is moderate, you could consider a 3:7 split-staking ratio — 30% following aggressive Bitcoin longs, 70% following stable macro portfolios. However, the prerequisite is finding traders with complete review records and strong stop-loss execution discipline. VanEck's predictions are worth listening to, but for real capital deployment, historical performance of the executors still speaks louder.