#Solana行情走势解读 On-Chain Data Reveals the Truth: Deep Analysis of the PIPPIN Project
Recently, I saw someone praising a certain Solana ecosystem project's operator as a "top player." After reviewing on-chain data, the truth emerged—the trading behavior of the top 100 addresses was surprisingly consistent: only buying, never selling.
The reasons behind this are worth considering. Tokens like PIPPIN have most of their liquidity on-chain, but the liquidity on this chain itself is stretched thin. Once the operator wants to seriously cash out, the slippage losses would be unbearable. The result is accumulating chips that become increasingly locked in, and fewer people willing to take positions.
What's even more interesting is the operating strategy—pulling up market cap during bear markets while quietly holding 80% of the chips themselves. In such a situation, how could institutional capital feel comfortable entering? Without whale participation, retail investors can only do short-term trading, and there's no real deep engagement.
At the end of the day, liquidity constraints combined with excessively concentrated chip distribution make these projects easily fall into the awkward situation of "looking good on paper but failing to attract buyers." The market cap chart looks impressive, but actual trading volume and capital depth are severely mismatched. For investors looking to participate in Solana ecosystem projects, these on-chain traces deserve closer examination—data is always more honest than narratives.
На этой странице может содержаться сторонний контент, который предоставляется исключительно в информационных целях (не в качестве заявлений/гарантий) и не должен рассматриваться как поддержка взглядов компании Gate или как финансовый или профессиональный совет. Подробности смотрите в разделе «Отказ от ответственности» .
#Solana行情走势解读 On-Chain Data Reveals the Truth: Deep Analysis of the PIPPIN Project
Recently, I saw someone praising a certain Solana ecosystem project's operator as a "top player." After reviewing on-chain data, the truth emerged—the trading behavior of the top 100 addresses was surprisingly consistent: only buying, never selling.
The reasons behind this are worth considering. Tokens like PIPPIN have most of their liquidity on-chain, but the liquidity on this chain itself is stretched thin. Once the operator wants to seriously cash out, the slippage losses would be unbearable. The result is accumulating chips that become increasingly locked in, and fewer people willing to take positions.
What's even more interesting is the operating strategy—pulling up market cap during bear markets while quietly holding 80% of the chips themselves. In such a situation, how could institutional capital feel comfortable entering? Without whale participation, retail investors can only do short-term trading, and there's no real deep engagement.
At the end of the day, liquidity constraints combined with excessively concentrated chip distribution make these projects easily fall into the awkward situation of "looking good on paper but failing to attract buyers." The market cap chart looks impressive, but actual trading volume and capital depth are severely mismatched. For investors looking to participate in Solana ecosystem projects, these on-chain traces deserve closer examination—data is always more honest than narratives.