Introduction: Investment Comparison of HP vs IMX
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Hippo Protocol (HP) and Immutable (IMX) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positions in the crypto asset landscape.
Hippo Protocol (HP): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its regulation-compliant infrastructure for healthcare data management.
Immutable (IMX): Introduced as a layer 2 scaling solution for NFTs on Ethereum, it has been recognized for its instant transactions and zero gas fees for minting and trading.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between HP and IMX, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question investors are most concerned about:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
HP (Coin A) and IMX (Coin B) Historical Price Trends
- 2025: HP dropped to its all-time low of $0.02602 on November 5, likely due to market-wide bearish sentiment.
- 2021: IMX reached its all-time high of $9.52 on November 26, possibly influenced by the overall crypto bull market.
- Comparative Analysis: During the recent market cycle, HP fell from its high of $0.055 to $0.02734, while IMX experienced a more significant decline from $9.52 to $0.3674.
Current Market Situation (2025-11-18)
- HP current price: $0.02734
- IMX current price: $0.3674
- 24-hour trading volume: HP $104,194.41 vs IMX $102,552.80
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 11 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Key Factors Affecting Investment Value of HP vs IMX
Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)
- IMX: Recent performance shows value increase of 22.64% over a week with 24-hour trading volume rising by 20.06% to $42 million
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Enterprise Adoption: IMX has developed a series of medical cost indices planned for futures products, providing trading and hedging tools for pharmaceutical companies, medical institutions, insurance providers, and healthcare industry investors
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- IMX Technical Development: Technical indicators on IMX token's daily chart show positive signals based on recent performance
- Ecosystem Comparison: IMX focuses on healthcare industry applications through specialized indices
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Historical investment performance is not a guarantee of future results
- Market volatility affects investment targets' prices, values, and returns to varying degrees
- Different time periods and assumptions may lead to different investment outcomes
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: HP vs IMX
Short-term Forecast (2025)
- HP: Conservative $0.0188439 - $0.02731 | Optimistic $0.02731 - $0.035503
- IMX: Conservative $0.227664 - $0.3672 | Optimistic $0.3672 - $0.433296
Mid-term Forecast (2027)
- HP may enter a growth phase, with estimated price range $0.0308097765 - $0.0499803041
- IMX may enter a consolidation phase, with estimated price range $0.2499148512 - $0.4864414068
- Key drivers: Institutional fund inflows, ETFs, ecosystem development
Long-term Forecast (2030)
- HP: Base scenario $0.053928149044912 - $0.076577971643775 | Optimistic scenario $0.076577971643775+
- IMX: Base scenario $0.69981826047804 - $0.797792816944965 | Optimistic scenario $0.797792816944965+
View detailed price predictions for HP and IMX
Disclaimer: The above predictions are based on historical data and market analysis. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to rapid changes. These forecasts should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
HP:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.035503 |
0.02731 |
0.0188439 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.03705967 |
0.0314065 |
0.02449707 |
14 |
| 2027 |
0.0499803041 |
0.034233085 |
0.0308097765 |
25 |
| 2028 |
0.049685899569 |
0.04210669455 |
0.036211757313 |
54 |
| 2029 |
0.061960001030325 |
0.0458962970595 |
0.0275377782357 |
67 |
| 2030 |
0.076577971643775 |
0.053928149044912 |
0.048535334140421 |
97 |
IMX:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.433296 |
0.3672 |
0.227664 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.49230504 |
0.400248 |
0.28817856 |
9 |
| 2027 |
0.4864414068 |
0.44627652 |
0.2499148512 |
21 |
| 2028 |
0.680884086564 |
0.4663589634 |
0.251833840236 |
27 |
| 2029 |
0.82601499597408 |
0.573621524982 |
0.33843669973938 |
56 |
| 2030 |
0.797792816944965 |
0.69981826047804 |
0.454881869310726 |
90 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: HP vs IMX
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- HP: Suitable for investors focused on healthcare data management and regulatory compliance
- IMX: Suitable for investors interested in NFT infrastructure and gaming ecosystems
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: HP: 30% vs IMX: 70%
- Aggressive investors: HP: 60% vs IMX: 40%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risks
- HP: Limited market recognition and adoption in the healthcare sector
- IMX: Dependence on NFT market trends and Ethereum ecosystem
Technical Risks
- HP: Scalability, network stability
- IMX: Reliance on Ethereum's development, potential Layer 2 competition
Regulatory Risks
- Global regulatory policies may have different impacts on healthcare data management (HP) and NFT trading platforms (IMX)
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- HP advantages: Regulation-compliant infrastructure for healthcare data management
- IMX advantages: Established position in NFT infrastructure, zero gas fees for minting and trading
✅ Investment Advice:
- Novice investors: Consider a balanced approach with a higher allocation to IMX due to its more established market position
- Experienced investors: Evaluate personal risk tolerance and sector preferences between healthcare and NFT markets
- Institutional investors: Conduct thorough due diligence on both projects, considering long-term potential in respective sectors
⚠️ Risk Warning: Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between HP and IMX?
A: HP focuses on regulation-compliant infrastructure for healthcare data management, while IMX is a layer 2 scaling solution for NFTs on Ethereum, offering instant transactions and zero gas fees for minting and trading.
Q2: Which coin has performed better historically?
A: IMX reached a higher all-time high of $9.52 in November 2021, compared to HP's high of $0.055. However, IMX has also experienced a more significant decline since then.
Q3: What are the current prices of HP and IMX?
A: As of November 18, 2025, HP's current price is $0.02734, while IMX's current price is $0.3674.
Q4: How do the supply mechanisms of HP and IMX compare?
A: Detailed supply mechanism information for HP is not provided in the context. For IMX, recent performance shows a value increase of 22.64% over a week with a 24-hour trading volume rise of 20.06% to $42 million.
Q5: What are the long-term price predictions for HP and IMX?
A: For 2030, HP's base scenario prediction is $0.053928149044912 - $0.076577971643775, while IMX's base scenario prediction is $0.69981826047804 - $0.797792816944965.
Q6: Which coin is considered a better investment for different types of investors?
A: For novice investors, a balanced approach with a higher allocation to IMX is suggested due to its more established market position. Experienced investors should evaluate personal risk tolerance and sector preferences. Institutional investors are advised to conduct thorough due diligence on both projects.
Q7: What are the main risks associated with investing in HP and IMX?
A: For HP, risks include limited market recognition and adoption in the healthcare sector, as well as potential scalability and network stability issues. For IMX, risks include dependence on NFT market trends, the Ethereum ecosystem, and potential Layer 2 competition.