ID vs MANA: The Battle for Digital Identity in the Metaverse Era

Introduction: Investment Comparison of ID vs MANA

In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Space ID (ID) vs Decentraland (MANA) has always been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.

Space ID (ID): Launched in 2023, it has gained market recognition for its universal name service network and Web3 identity solutions.

Decentraland (MANA): Since its inception in 2017, it has been hailed as a pioneering virtual world platform based on blockchain technology, becoming one of the most recognized projects in the metaverse space.

This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between ID and MANA, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, while attempting to answer the question that concerns investors the most:

"Which is the better buy right now?"

I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status

SPACE ID (ID) and Decentraland (MANA) Historical Price Trends

• 2024: ID reached its all-time high of $1.8404 due to increased adoption of Web3 domain services.
• 2021: MANA experienced a significant price surge, reaching an all-time high of $5.85, driven by the metaverse hype.
• Comparative analysis: During the recent market cycle, ID dropped from its peak of $1.8404 to a low of $0.0554, while MANA declined from $5.85 to its current price of $0.193, showing a more severe correction.

Current Market Situation (2025-11-18)

• ID current price: $0.08583
• MANA current price: $0.193
• 24-hour trading volume: ID $15,831,708 vs MANA $160,165,204
• Market sentiment index (Fear & Greed Index): 11 (Extreme Fear)

Click to view real-time prices:

• Check ID current price Market Price
• Check MANA current price Market Price

II. Core Factors Influencing ID vs MANA Investment Value

Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)

• MANA: According to the SEC's analysis, MANA is considered a security token that was issued and sold as an investment contract.
• Market observation: All MANA tokens tend to rise or fall in price together, following common market patterns.
• 📌 Historical pattern: Supply mechanisms influence price cyclicality in cryptocurrency markets, with market demand playing a key role.

Institutional Adoption and Market Applications

• Institutional holdings: Limited data available on institutional preference between these assets.
• Enterprise adoption: MANA serves as the utility token for Decentraland's virtual reality platform.
• Regulatory stance: The SEC has identified MANA as one of several tokens (alongside MATIC, CHZ, SAND, and LUNA) that it considers securities.

Technology Development and Ecosystem Building

• MANA ecosystem: Functions within the decentralized virtual reality space, with its value tied to the growth and adoption of the Decentraland metaverse.
• Market positioning: MANA's value is directly connected to trends in the virtual reality market and metaverse development.
• Ecosystem comparison: MANA has specific utility within its native platform for virtual land transactions and other metaverse activities.

Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles

• Investment considerations: Key factors affecting both assets include market demand, technological development, and community support.
• Risk factors: Both tokens face high volatility, with investors advised to monitor market fluctuations and technological innovations.
• Market dynamics: Consumer behavior, including considerations of price, functionality, and alternatives, affects the value proposition of blockchain-based platforms.

III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: ID vs MANA

Short-term Prediction (2025)

• ID: Conservative $0.0608541 - $0.08571 | Optimistic $0.08571 - $0.1002807
• MANA: Conservative $0.131308 - $0.1931 | Optimistic $0.1931 - $0.25103

Mid-term Prediction (2027)

• ID may enter a growth phase, with prices estimated between $0.0580523472375 and $0.145658616705
• MANA may enter a consolidation phase, with prices estimated between $0.18616819275 and $0.31028032125
• Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETFs, ecosystem development

Long-term Prediction (2030)

• ID: Base scenario $0.153714382606564 - $0.221348710953452 | Optimistic scenario $0.221348710953452+
• MANA: Base scenario $0.410219314351875 - $0.520978529226881 | Optimistic scenario $0.520978529226881+

View detailed price predictions for ID and MANA

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on historical data and market projections. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. This information should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

ID:

MANA:

IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: ID vs MANA

Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies

• ID: Suitable for investors focused on Web3 identity solutions and domain services
• MANA: Suitable for investors interested in metaverse and virtual reality platforms

Risk Management and Asset Allocation

• Conservative investors: ID: 30% vs MANA: 70%
• Aggressive investors: ID: 60% vs MANA: 40%
• Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios

V. Potential Risk Comparison

Market Risks

• ID: Relatively new project, potential for high volatility
• MANA: Subject to metaverse market trends and adoption rates

Technical Risks

• ID: Scalability, network stability
• MANA: Platform security, virtual world performance issues

Regulatory Risks

• Global regulatory policies may affect both differently, with MANA already identified as a security token by the SEC

VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?

📌 Investment Value Summary:

• ID advantages: Growing adoption in Web3 identity solutions, potential for ecosystem expansion
• MANA advantages: Established presence in metaverse space, wider recognition and adoption

✅ Investment Advice:

• New investors: Consider a balanced approach, leaning towards MANA for its established market presence
• Experienced investors: Explore ID for potential growth, while maintaining MANA exposure
• Institutional investors: Evaluate both based on specific portfolio needs and risk tolerance

⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice. None

VII. FAQ

Q1: What are the main differences between Space ID (ID) and Decentraland (MANA)? A: Space ID focuses on Web3 identity solutions and domain services, while Decentraland is a virtual reality platform in the metaverse space. ID is a newer project launched in 2023, whereas MANA has been around since 2017 and is more established in the market.

Q2: How do the current prices and market situations of ID and MANA compare? A: As of 2025-11-18, ID's price is $0.08583, while MANA's price is $0.193. MANA has a significantly higher 24-hour trading volume of $160,165,204 compared to ID's $15,831,708. The market sentiment index is at 11, indicating extreme fear.

Q3: What are the key factors influencing the investment value of ID and MANA? A: Key factors include supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technology development, ecosystem building, and macroeconomic factors. MANA is considered a security token by the SEC, while ID's regulatory status is less clear. Both are influenced by market demand and technological innovations in their respective fields.

Q4: What are the price predictions for ID and MANA in the short and long term? A: For 2025, ID's conservative estimate is $0.0608541 - $0.08571, while MANA's is $0.131308 - $0.1931. By 2030, ID's base scenario is $0.153714382606564 - $0.221348710953452, and MANA's is $0.410219314351875 - $0.520978529226881. These predictions are subject to market volatility and should not be considered financial advice.

Q5: How do the investment strategies for ID and MANA differ? A: ID is suitable for investors focused on Web3 identity solutions, while MANA is better for those interested in metaverse platforms. Conservative investors might allocate 30% to ID and 70% to MANA, while aggressive investors might opt for 60% ID and 40% MANA.

Q6: What are the potential risks associated with investing in ID and MANA? A: Both face market risks due to volatility. ID, being newer, may have higher volatility. Technical risks include scalability for ID and platform security for MANA. Regulatory risks are present for both, with MANA already classified as a security token by the SEC.

Q7: Which is considered the better buy between ID and MANA? A: The better buy depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance. ID may offer growth potential in Web3 solutions, while MANA has an established presence in the metaverse space. New investors might lean towards MANA for its market presence, while experienced investors could explore ID for potential growth opportunities.