Introduction: PIPPIN vs LRC Investment Comparison
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between PIPPIN vs LRC has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance but also represent different positions in the crypto asset landscape.
PIPPIN (PIPPIN): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition as a meme token on the Solana blockchain.
Loopring (LRC): Since 2017, it has been hailed as an open, multi-token transaction protocol based on ERC20 and smart contracts, aiming to establish decentralized exchange applications.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between PIPPIN vs LRC, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question that concerns investors the most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
PIPPIN (Coin A) and LRC (Coin B) Historical Price Trends
- 2025: PIPPIN reached its all-time high of $0.16375 on January 25, 2025, and its all-time low of $0.00165 on October 10, 2025, showing significant volatility within the year.
- 2021: LRC experienced a major price surge, reaching its all-time high of $3.75 on November 10, 2021, likely due to increased interest in layer-2 scaling solutions for Ethereum.
- Comparative analysis: In the recent market cycle, PIPPIN has shown extreme volatility, swinging from $0.16375 to $0.00165 within a year. LRC, on the other hand, has experienced a long-term decline from its 2021 high, currently trading at a much lower price point.
Current Market Situation (2025-11-19)
- PIPPIN current price: $0.02556
- LRC current price: $0.05863
- 24-hour trading volume: PIPPIN $266,980.28 vs LRC $90,173.49
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 15 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Key Factors Affecting the Investment Value of PIPPIN vs LRC
Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)
- PIPPIN: No information available about supply mechanism
- LRC: No information available about supply mechanism
- 📌 Historical Pattern: No data available on how supply mechanisms drive price cycle changes.
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional Holdings: No information available about institutional preference
- Enterprise Adoption: No information available about applications in cross-border payments, settlements, or portfolio investments
- National Policies: No information available about regulatory attitudes in different countries
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- Technical Upgrades: No information available about technical developments for either token
- Ecosystem Comparison: No information available about DeFi, NFT, payment, or smart contract implementations
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Performance in Inflationary Environments: No information available about anti-inflation properties
- Macroeconomic Monetary Policy: No information available about the impact of interest rates or the dollar index
- Geopolitical Factors: No information available about cross-border transaction demands or international situations
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: PIPPIN vs LRC
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- PIPPIN: Conservative $0.0208494 - $0.02574 | Optimistic $0.02574 - $0.0301158
- LRC: Conservative $0.048093 - $0.05865 | Optimistic $0.05865 - $0.065688
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- PIPPIN may enter a growth phase, with prices estimated at $0.018824800995 - $0.036106585515
- LRC may enter a consolidation phase, with prices estimated at $0.0445192209 - $0.07487323515
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETFs, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- PIPPIN: Base scenario $0.028186374529813 - $0.046977290883022 | Optimistic scenario $0.046977290883022 - $0.058251840694947
- LRC: Base scenario $0.081262795621644 - $0.09029199513516 | Optimistic scenario $0.09029199513516 - $0.094806594891918
View detailed price predictions for PIPPIN and LRC
Disclaimer
PIPPIN:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.0301158 |
0.02574 |
0.0208494 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.033792759 |
0.0279279 |
0.020945925 |
9 |
| 2027 |
0.036106585515 |
0.0308603295 |
0.018824800995 |
20 |
| 2028 |
0.04352849475975 |
0.0334834575075 |
0.029130608031525 |
30 |
| 2029 |
0.05544860563242 |
0.038505976133625 |
0.025413944248192 |
50 |
| 2030 |
0.058251840694947 |
0.046977290883022 |
0.028186374529813 |
83 |
LRC:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.065688 |
0.05865 |
0.048093 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.07273773 |
0.062169 |
0.05346534 |
6 |
| 2027 |
0.07487323515 |
0.067453365 |
0.0445192209 |
15 |
| 2028 |
0.076856364081 |
0.071163300075 |
0.04198634704425 |
21 |
| 2029 |
0.10657415819232 |
0.074009832078 |
0.04292570260524 |
26 |
| 2030 |
0.094806594891918 |
0.09029199513516 |
0.081262795621644 |
54 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: PIPPIN vs LRC
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- PIPPIN: Suitable for investors focused on short-term trading and high-risk, high-reward opportunities
- LRC: Suitable for investors interested in long-term blockchain infrastructure development
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: PIPPIN: 5% vs LRC: 15%
- Aggressive investors: PIPPIN: 15% vs LRC: 25%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- PIPPIN: High volatility, susceptible to rapid price swings
- LRC: Dependent on Ethereum ecosystem growth, potentially affected by layer-2 competition
Technical Risk
- PIPPIN: Scalability issues on Solana network, potential network congestion
- LRC: Smart contract vulnerabilities, potential scaling challenges
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may impact both tokens differently, with meme coins potentially facing stricter scrutiny
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- PIPPIN advantages: High short-term growth potential, popular meme coin on Solana
- LRC advantages: Established protocol with longer track record, focus on decentralized exchange technology
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a small allocation to LRC as part of a diversified portfolio
- Experienced investors: Balance between PIPPIN and LRC based on risk tolerance and market outlook
- Institutional investors: Focus on LRC for its more established technology and potential long-term value
⚠️ Risk Warning: Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between PIPPIN and LRC?
A: PIPPIN is a meme token on the Solana blockchain, while LRC is an open, multi-token transaction protocol based on Ethereum. PIPPIN shows higher volatility and is more suitable for short-term trading, whereas LRC focuses on long-term blockchain infrastructure development.
Q2: Which token has shown better price performance recently?
A: In the recent market cycle, PIPPIN has shown extreme volatility, swinging from $0.16375 to $0.00165 within a year. LRC, on the other hand, has experienced a long-term decline from its 2021 high of $3.75, currently trading at a much lower price point.
Q3: What are the current prices and trading volumes for PIPPIN and LRC?
A: As of 2025-11-19, PIPPIN's price is $0.02556 with a 24-hour trading volume of $266,980.28. LRC's price is $0.05863 with a 24-hour trading volume of $90,173.49.
Q4: How do the future price predictions compare for PIPPIN and LRC?
A: For 2030, PIPPIN's base scenario price range is $0.028186374529813 - $0.046977290883022, while LRC's is $0.081262795621644 - $0.09029199513516. LRC is predicted to have a higher long-term price.
Q5: What are the main risks associated with investing in PIPPIN and LRC?
A: PIPPIN faces high volatility and potential scalability issues on the Solana network. LRC is dependent on Ethereum ecosystem growth and may face competition from other layer-2 solutions. Both tokens are subject to regulatory risks, with meme coins potentially facing stricter scrutiny.
Q6: How should different types of investors approach PIPPIN and LRC?
A: New investors might consider a small allocation to LRC as part of a diversified portfolio. Experienced investors could balance between PIPPIN and LRC based on risk tolerance. Institutional investors may focus on LRC for its more established technology and potential long-term value.