
These are two primary gateways for trading cryptocurrencies.
A centralized exchange (CEX) is a trading platform operated by a company, which matches buy and sell orders and holds users’ funds on their behalf. Well-known examples include Gate. In contrast, a decentralized exchange (DEX) operates on a blockchain using smart contracts to facilitate trades, with assets remaining in the user’s own wallet. The two models differ in terms of asset custody, compliance processes, trading depth, and fee structures.
Choosing between these gateways has direct implications for security, costs, and accessibility.
If you need fiat on-ramps, compliance checks, deep order books, and trading tools such as leverage and derivatives, a centralized exchange is typically more suitable. Users who prioritize self-custody, global access, no account approvals, and are comfortable managing their own risks may prefer decentralized exchanges.
In the same market conditions, fee structures differ: centralized exchanges usually charge maker/taker fees, while decentralized exchanges require users to pay network gas fees and may experience slippage. Most beginners start with centralized exchanges before exploring on-chain swaps and yield strategies.
The core difference is “who holds the funds and who matches the trades.”
On a centralized exchange, funds are deposited into platform-controlled accounts. The exchange maintains an order book and matches buy and sell orders, providing users with consolidated prices and deep liquidity. Key advantages include fast execution, minimal slippage, and a wide range of assets. However, users must trust the platform to safeguard their funds and disclose reserves transparently.
Decentralized exchanges use smart contracts to execute trades directly on-chain. A common model is the “liquidity pool,” where users deposit pairs of tokens, and swaps are performed based on algorithmic pricing. Benefits include self-custody of assets, full on-chain transparency, and 24/7 availability without intermediaries. Users must pay gas fees; large trades may encounter significant slippage if liquidity is low, and contract security is also a concern.
Centralized exchanges function as “comprehensive trading platforms,” while decentralized exchanges serve as “on-chain swap and strategy gateways.”
On centralized exchanges:
On decentralized exchanges:
Why this distinction? Centralized exchanges centralize order matching and custody for efficiency and liquidity depth; decentralized exchanges encode rules into smart contracts for composability, openness, and global accessibility.
Choose your preferred gateway and follow step-by-step processes for safety:
Step 1 (CEX): Complete identity verification and security setup. Create an account on Gate, enable two-factor authentication, and whitelist withdrawal addresses.
Step 2 (CEX): Deposit funds and place orders. Use fiat channels to purchase USDT, select trading pairs in the spot market, place limit or market orders, and pay attention to maker/taker fees.
Step 3 (CEX): Withdraw funds and secure them. For long-term holding, transfer assets to your own wallet; ensure correct networks and tags are used—test withdrawals with small amounts first.
Step 1 (DEX): Prepare your wallet and network. Create a wallet address using a browser extension wallet, back up your seed phrase, and choose the relevant blockchain network (e.g., Ethereum or its Layer 2).
Step 2 (DEX): Acquire gas tokens and authorize transactions. Hold some native tokens to cover gas fees; connect your wallet to the trading interface, approve tokens for trading, and set appropriate slippage tolerance.
Step 3 (DEX): Test with small trades for risk control. Start with small swaps to verify the process before scaling up; monitor minimum received amounts, price impact, and ensure smart contracts are official.
Over the past year, market structure and user preferences have diverged and evolved together.
Throughout 2025, industry reports (such as quarterly reviews by CCData or Kaiko in Q3/Q4 2025) indicate that centralized exchanges account for about 80%–90% of spot trading volume, while decentralized exchanges hold a 10%–20% share; during periods of high weekly volatility, DEXs have occasionally approached a 20% share. The derivatives market remains dominated by CEXs with over 95% market share.
In H2 2025, increased Layer 2 activity boosted on-chain trading. Multiple reports highlight that Ethereum Layer 2 networks saw a higher share of trades on leading DEXs compared to 2024—with some DEXs recording over 50% of their total transactions on Layer 2. This is attributed to lower gas costs and faster confirmations.
Regarding capital flows and stablecoins, the total stablecoin supply rebounded throughout 2025; major stablecoins saw significant year-on-year growth in circulation. Demand for fiat on-ramps increased usage of centralized exchange spot and savings products. Simultaneously, on-chain airdrops and new project launches fueled demand for long-tail asset liquidity on DEXs.
In risk management, after Q3 2025 most leading centralized platforms maintained monthly or periodic proof-of-reserves disclosures, reflecting growing user demand for asset transparency. On decentralized exchanges, contract audits and real-time monitoring tools became more common; however, isolated contract incidents continue to remind users about the importance of diversifying funds and splitting large trades.
Exaggerating either side’s strengths can lead to risks.
Myth 1: “Decentralized exchanges are absolutely safe.” While smart contracts are public, they can have vulnerabilities; users must also safeguard their private keys—lost keys cannot be recovered. Best practices: use reputable contracts, split transactions across batches, grant only necessary permissions.
Myth 2: “Centralized exchanges are always unsafe.” Leading platforms continuously improve risk controls and reserve disclosures; however, risk is never zero. Recommended approach: enable all security features, review proof-of-reserves updates regularly, self-custody a portion of your holdings for the long term.
Myth 3: “On-chain trading is always more expensive.” It’s true that gas fees can spike during mainnet congestion; however, trading on Layer 2 or during off-peak times may result in lower costs than CEX maker/taker fees for small transactions. The key is choosing the optimal route based on transaction size and network conditions.
Myth 4: “The more fragmented your liquidity is, the better.” Over-diversification can increase operational overhead. Best practice: manage core assets centrally; experiment with new strategies using small amounts—set stop-losses and alerts as needed.
Centralized exchanges (like Gate) are generally more beginner-friendly. They offer intuitive interfaces, customer support services, and fiat deposit/withdrawal channels—much like traditional banks. While decentralized exchanges give you full control over assets, they require self-managed wallets and payment of gas fees, making them less accessible for newcomers. It’s recommended to start with a centralized exchange before exploring DEXs.
While decentralized exchanges can’t be hacked at the platform level (since there’s no central server), risks shift to your personal wallet. If your private key is leaked or if there’s a smart contract vulnerability, your assets could still be lost. Centralized exchanges carry hacking risks too but top platforms (such as Gate) often have insurance funds and security protocols in place. Both options carry risks—the key is protecting your private key or choosing reputable platforms.
Centralized exchanges generally offer lower and more transparent fees (for example: Gate’s maker fee is 0.2%, costing only a few dollars per trade). On DEXs you’ll pay transaction fees plus additional blockchain gas fees, which can surge to tens or even hundreds of dollars during peak times on networks like Ethereum. For small trades, CEXs are usually more cost-effective.
Liquidity refers to the number of counterparties available—it determines how quickly you can trade at your desired price. Centralized exchanges usually offer deep liquidity due to large user bases—trades execute almost instantly. DEXs often have lower liquidity; this can lead to slippage (when execution prices deviate from expectations), especially affecting frequent traders or those executing large orders.
Reputable centralized exchanges (like Gate) operate under regulatory oversight with robust risk controls and insurance funds—making exit scams highly unlikely. However, platform choice matters: look for licensing status, security track record, and transparent fund reporting. While there’s no exit risk with DEXs, smart contract vulnerabilities remain possible. Overall, choosing a top-tier platform matters more than just picking between CEX or DEX.


