This afternoon at 18:07, an on-chain movement was detected — 891.09 BTC was transferred from an address starting with bc1q9vl9d, worth approximately 80.02 million USD.
This batch of coins didn't go directly to the destination, there was an intermediary step, and in the end, 876.09 coins landed at another Address starting with bc1qce8pg. What about the missing 15 coins? They were probably lost in fees and transfer losses.
Recently, large on-chain BTC movements have become more frequent. Judging by the rhythm of the actions, it’s typical of over-the-counter rebalancing or transfers between institutions—either whales are repositioning their holdings, or institutions are reallocating internal funds.
Transfers of this magnitude are generally not possible for retail investors.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeVictim
· 56m ago
Another large-scale arbitrage... Looks like the whales are quietly reallocating their portfolios again.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 6h ago
Based on on-chain data, the transfer pattern of 891.09 BTC does indeed display institutional characteristics—using two intermediary addresses, precise fee control, and a clear transfer time window. Notably, the frequency of single transfers at the eight-figure USD level has risen significantly recently. This phenomenon may indicate that institutions are reassessing their portfolio allocations or conducting cross-platform fund transfers. Retail investors are unlikely to achieve this scale and level of discretion, but we still need to be vigilant about the potential quiet movement of risky assets.
View OriginalReply0
ChainProspector
· 12-01 16:14
More than 900 coins disappeared in the blink of an eye, this pace is really a bit fast... Did the fees consume 15 btc? Or is there something more to it?
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 12-01 15:55
Another large transfer has occurred, it seems someone is secretly rearranging their positions again.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMaster
· 12-01 15:54
More than 900 coins can be transferred at will, this kind of operation... how can retail investors afford to play, it must be big fish moving their homes.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694b
· 12-01 15:53
Transferring 80 million dollars is like a game; retail investors might never see so many coins swaying in their own Wallets in their lifetime.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 12-01 15:49
The move of 80 million dollars, with some flipping in between... this rhythm is a bit strange, is it really just a loss in fees?
If the health factor drops one more level, we need to be careful of a chain liquidation.
Whales are reconfiguring, retail investors should wake up now.
This frequency is a bit intense, the scent of systemic risk is getting stronger.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinTherapist
· 12-01 15:48
15 BTC was lost as soon as 891 BTC was transferred, what an astonishing fee... However, this rhythm does seem like Large Investors are repositioning, retail investors cannot make such a commotion.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 12-01 15:48
lmao 15 btc just vanished into the void... ngl that fee structure is *chef's kiss* inefficient. institutional reshuffling or whale repositioning? honestly at this point the difference feels like semantics when you're moving 80m around like it's pocket change. the real question is where's it going *next*... pattern recognition screaming something but can't quite articulate it yet
Reply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 12-01 15:41
More than 890 pieces, this amount is really unmanageable, ordinary people can't play at all.
This afternoon at 18:07, an on-chain movement was detected — 891.09 BTC was transferred from an address starting with bc1q9vl9d, worth approximately 80.02 million USD.
This batch of coins didn't go directly to the destination, there was an intermediary step, and in the end, 876.09 coins landed at another Address starting with bc1qce8pg. What about the missing 15 coins? They were probably lost in fees and transfer losses.
Recently, large on-chain BTC movements have become more frequent. Judging by the rhythm of the actions, it’s typical of over-the-counter rebalancing or transfers between institutions—either whales are repositioning their holdings, or institutions are reallocating internal funds.
Transfers of this magnitude are generally not possible for retail investors.