Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

There's something puzzling about the Bank of England's recent moves. On one hand, they keep flagging shadow banking risks publicly. On the other? They're loosening the reins on conventional banks. The contradiction is striking – how does weakening traditional banking safeguards align with shadow banking concerns? This disconnect in regulatory philosophy raises questions about coherent oversight strategy in today's financial landscape.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MoneyBurnerSocietyvip
· 17h ago
Whoa, the Bank of England's move is truly a textbook case of "drawing a circle with the left hand and a square with the right." I'm speechless. On one hand, they're warning about risks in shadow banking, while on the other, they're giving traditional banks the green light. Isn't this just a regulatory version of negative alpha? Impressive.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSellervip
· 18h ago
I really don't get it—on one hand, they're shouting about shadow banking risks, and on the other, they're loosening regulations on traditional banks. Does this logic make any sense?
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerkervip
· 18h ago
The Bank of England's move is really a bit unbelievable... On one hand, they’re warning about shadow banking risks, and on the other, they’re easing restrictions for traditional banks? Does this logic even add up?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)