No mention of financial fragility. Geopolitical tensions? Absent. Supply chain vulnerabilities, governance collapse, ecological tipping points—nowhere to be found.
When every lens focuses solely on capital flows, the real world fades into abstraction. We've reached a peculiar moment: risk frameworks that systematically exclude existential threats.
The metrics obsession creates its own blindness. Markets price what's measurable while systemic fractures accumulate in the shadows. This isn't risk management—it's selective perception disguised as analysis.
How did we arrive at methodologies that treat planetary stability as externalities?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
pvt_key_collector
· 12-04 19:48
Nah, this is just ridiculous. Treating the Earth as an externality—you deserve to get what's coming to you.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassin
· 12-04 19:48
This is a typical case of "burying one's head in the sand"—only focusing on market data while turning a blind eye to geopolitics, climate, and governance failures.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen't
· 12-04 19:47
LOL, there's no geopolitical tension on the risk list? That's just ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuilder
· 12-04 19:40
This is the paradox of capitalism, only seeing where the money is.
View OriginalReply0
ArbitrageBot
· 12-04 19:31
A typical case of self-hypnosis in the financial world—only seeing the numbers but not the reality.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 12-04 19:25
LOL, you can only see where the money is flowing, but you can’t see if the world is about to explode? This is your risk management?
Apollo's top 5 risk list? Fascinating omissions.
No mention of financial fragility. Geopolitical tensions? Absent. Supply chain vulnerabilities, governance collapse, ecological tipping points—nowhere to be found.
When every lens focuses solely on capital flows, the real world fades into abstraction. We've reached a peculiar moment: risk frameworks that systematically exclude existential threats.
The metrics obsession creates its own blindness. Markets price what's measurable while systemic fractures accumulate in the shadows. This isn't risk management—it's selective perception disguised as analysis.
How did we arrive at methodologies that treat planetary stability as externalities?