Gensler dropped another take: most tokens out there? Pure speculation. No real fundamentals backing them up. But Bitcoin—that's different. Sure, it swings like crazy, but he sees it leaning more toward commodity territory. The distinction matters when you're talking regulation and market positioning.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OPsychology
· 7h ago
Gensler is still using the same rhetoric, saying that other coins are all worthless... Why is it that only BTC gets special treatment?
View OriginalReply0
RatioHunter
· 7h ago
Gensler's statements are nothing new; his assessment of BTC as a commodity is fairly reasonable. But if you think about it carefully... he's basically sentencing other coins to death.
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 7h ago
Gensler is distinguishing between tokens again. To put it plainly, he just wants to give BTC the green light, and as for other tokens... you guys can speculate however you want.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 7h ago
Gensler is throwing blame again, saying most tokens are worthless... Fine, but he singles out BTC as a commodity. That logic is interesting—so is he ranking cryptocurrencies now?
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larry
· 7h ago
Gensler is spouting official rhetoric again—so all other coins are just vapor, but BTC is different? Hah, I'm tired of hearing this excuse. Do they really think being classified as a commodity can help them dodge the regulatory axe?
Gensler dropped another take: most tokens out there? Pure speculation. No real fundamentals backing them up. But Bitcoin—that's different. Sure, it swings like crazy, but he sees it leaning more toward commodity territory. The distinction matters when you're talking regulation and market positioning.