So there's this massive digital ID rollout happening in one South Asian country, and turns out it's become a playground for scammers. Makes you wonder—when governments rush these centralized identity systems without bulletproof security, who really pays the price?
The irony? This is exactly why decentralized identity solutions keep gaining traction. Think about it: one centralized database becomes a honeypot. Criminals breach it once, boom—millions of identities compromised.
Meanwhile, blockchain-based identity systems are flipping the script. Zero-knowledge proofs, self-sovereign identity, wallet-based verification... Sure, they're not perfect yet, but at least you're not trusting some government server that might as well have a "hack me" sign on it.
Anyone else seeing this as a wake-up call? Maybe Web3 identity isn't just some tech bro fantasy after all. When traditional systems fail this badly, decentralized alternatives start looking less like innovation and more like necessity.
What's your take—can blockchain actually solve identity theft, or are we just swapping one set of problems for another?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerumSquirter
· 12-07 09:57
Here we go again with the same old story: a centralized system fails and ordinary people foot the bill, then Web3 is supposed to save the world? Yeah right, like I’d believe that.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 12-07 09:55
LOL, yet another case of a government centralized database getting breached. When will they ever learn to use decentralized storage? Do they really have to wait until hackers strip them down to their underwear before they react?
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCut
· 12-07 09:53
Damn, another bunch of people had their identities stolen... If you ask me, centralized databases are just a hot potato.
But seriously, if I had to choose, I'd still trust the ones on-chain—at least no one can just freeze me out all at once.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 12-07 09:48
Another centralized gamble, and the losers are always ordinary people.
---
I really have no confidence in this system run by the government. Might as well put it on the blockchain.
---
To put it bluntly, it’s just putting all the eggs in one basket—and the basket has holes.
---
I’d actually like to see how blockchain can really solve this. Don’t just come up with another gimmick.
---
Come on, decentralization isn’t necessarily safer either; it just spreads out the risk.
---
I’ve said it long ago, letting the government control the data is just asking for trouble.
---
Web3 identity is indeed attractive, but ordinary people still can’t afford to use it right now.
---
Isn’t this just another example of being taken advantage of? Stop hyping both trad and web3.
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteran
· 12-07 09:45
No, a central database is just a ticking time bomb, I've been saying this for a long time.
---
Emm, can a blockchain identity system really be trusted? I think it still depends on the actual implementation.
---
Yet another wave of "Web3 savior" rhetoric, but it's true that traditional ID systems are a complete mess.
---
Basically, users have no choice—they have to gamble on both sides. Who knows which one is actually safer?
---
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but ordinary people can't use them at all. How are they supposed to be adopted?
---
This is exactly why I've always said decentralization is crucial, but unfortunately, governments will never want to give up control.
---
Is cryptography really reliable? It feels like hackers are breaking new things every day.
---
Wait, can self-sovereign identity really prevent people from being scammed? Ultimately, it's still about people's security awareness, right?
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashier
· 12-07 09:41
Yet another story of a centralized system failing—feels like there's really nothing new anymore.
So there's this massive digital ID rollout happening in one South Asian country, and turns out it's become a playground for scammers. Makes you wonder—when governments rush these centralized identity systems without bulletproof security, who really pays the price?
The irony? This is exactly why decentralized identity solutions keep gaining traction. Think about it: one centralized database becomes a honeypot. Criminals breach it once, boom—millions of identities compromised.
Meanwhile, blockchain-based identity systems are flipping the script. Zero-knowledge proofs, self-sovereign identity, wallet-based verification... Sure, they're not perfect yet, but at least you're not trusting some government server that might as well have a "hack me" sign on it.
Anyone else seeing this as a wake-up call? Maybe Web3 identity isn't just some tech bro fantasy after all. When traditional systems fail this badly, decentralized alternatives start looking less like innovation and more like necessity.
What's your take—can blockchain actually solve identity theft, or are we just swapping one set of problems for another?