AlignerZ Labs ditched the old rush-to-buy chaos. Their Initial Weight Offering (IWO) model works differently: you pick how long you'll lock tokens, and longer vesting periods score you bigger allocation shares.
Basically flips the game. Speed doesn't win anymore—commitment does. The patient players get rewarded over the quick-trigger crowd.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnlyOnMainnet
· 12-10 23:54
The longer the lock-up period, the more allocation you get? I like this logic; I finally don't have to compete with bots anymore.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 12-10 15:50
Another "game changer"... I've experienced it all. The longer the coins are locked, the more they are distributed. To put it plainly, it's just a variation of a Ponzi scheme.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9f682d4c
· 12-10 15:48
Forget it, I still think this model has some issues. Can it really prevent exploitation?
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChain
· 12-10 15:37
Someone finally figured it out: rushing to buy with quick fingers is really a tax on intelligence.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 12-10 15:36
Finally, I understand the project. The logic of locking in time for shares is indeed fairer and much better than that pay-to-win game.
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamer
· 12-10 15:26
I just like this kind of trick, finally no need to compete with internet speed anymore.
AlignerZ Labs ditched the old rush-to-buy chaos. Their Initial Weight Offering (IWO) model works differently: you pick how long you'll lock tokens, and longer vesting periods score you bigger allocation shares.
Basically flips the game. Speed doesn't win anymore—commitment does. The patient players get rewarded over the quick-trigger crowd.