【ChainWen】Recently, we’ve been watching the Fed’s moves and feel like they are about to clash internally. Although they’ve cut interest rates again—this is the third consecutive time—the disagreement within the committee about the future direction is huge.
The core contradiction is obvious: inflation is still high, and the labor market is starting to cool down. This kind of deadlock situation hasn’t been seen in decades. It’s somewhat reminiscent of the stagflation in the 1970s, when the Fed was hesitant and kept shifting policies, ultimately allowing high inflation to become a stubborn disease.
The current issue is that officials are clearly not interested in further rate cuts. Powell’s term expires in May next year, meaning he can only chair three more rate meetings. The final decision will likely depend on how he pushes.
UBS chief economist Jonathan Pingle said quite straightforwardly: “The closer interest rates get to the neutral level, the harder it becomes to reach consensus with each cut. You need enough solid data to persuade those opposing to side with rate cuts.”
In plain terms, the future monetary policy path is full of uncertainties, and the data quality directly influences the Fed’s stance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 1h ago
Powell only has three cards left, let's see how he plays this round.
Fed internal conflicts, the economy is in a dilemma—does it really resemble a replay of the 70s?
The room for rate cuts is shrinking, hard data is the key.
Three meetings set the tone; how much pressure does that imply...
It feels like the ghost of stagflation has returned—can we dodge it this time?
View OriginalReply0
DeepRabbitHole
· 15h ago
Powell, this guy is under a lot of pressure, with three meetings determining life or death, it feels like walking a tightrope.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 12-10 23:37
Powell only has three months left, so what's the rush? You should have seen the situation clearly a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 12-10 23:35
Powell only has three chances left, and he's really become the final decision-maker... Anyone would find this situation difficult.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuth
· 12-10 23:33
The Federal Reserve's repeated interest rate cuts feel like patching... I'm just waiting to see how Powell plays his last few cards.
Is the stagflation nightmare coming? I really don't want to watch this plot again.
The officials' internal conflicts are so intense; frankly, it's because there's no data backing them up. It's tough.
Does Powell only have three chances left to set the tone? The pressure is immense. This guy needs to make a decision.
Inflation isn't dead, and jobs are gone—it's truly a dilemma. The Fed is in trouble this time.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 12-10 23:33
After Powell's three main moves, it's time to pass the baton. At that point, I really don't know who can handle this mess.
View OriginalReply0
NervousFingers
· 12-10 23:32
The Fed folks are really stubborn, cutting rates while fighting with each other. It's giving me a headache.
Powell has only three months left. I wonder if he's aiming to leave a political legacy or truly cares about the economy.
Why does no one remember the lessons from stagflation? History is really repeating itself.
Cutting rates is becoming越来越难了, it seems that the data isn't strong enough to move this group's consensus.
The Federal Reserve is on the brink of internal disagreements—cut rates or not? Powell will set the tone in the remaining three meetings.
【ChainWen】Recently, we’ve been watching the Fed’s moves and feel like they are about to clash internally. Although they’ve cut interest rates again—this is the third consecutive time—the disagreement within the committee about the future direction is huge.
The core contradiction is obvious: inflation is still high, and the labor market is starting to cool down. This kind of deadlock situation hasn’t been seen in decades. It’s somewhat reminiscent of the stagflation in the 1970s, when the Fed was hesitant and kept shifting policies, ultimately allowing high inflation to become a stubborn disease.
The current issue is that officials are clearly not interested in further rate cuts. Powell’s term expires in May next year, meaning he can only chair three more rate meetings. The final decision will likely depend on how he pushes.
UBS chief economist Jonathan Pingle said quite straightforwardly: “The closer interest rates get to the neutral level, the harder it becomes to reach consensus with each cut. You need enough solid data to persuade those opposing to side with rate cuts.”
In plain terms, the future monetary policy path is full of uncertainties, and the data quality directly influences the Fed’s stance.