There's a bold vision being thrown around lately: imagine Solana becoming so powerful that when you're eyeing a token like FWD trading on both Solana and NASDAQ, you'd instinctively choose the on-chain version. Why? Better liquidity, faster settlement, lower fees—everything traditional markets struggle with.
That's the ultimate goal some folks are pushing for. Not just competing with centralized exchanges, but going head-to-head with legacy financial infrastructure itself. It's ambitious, sure, but that's exactly where this space is heading—making blockchain rails the obvious choice over traditional finance plumbing.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 12-12 06:48
How many years have passed since the slice of Solana surpassing traditional finance was baked? According to the database, similar promises have been delayed at least times. Let's wait patiently for the bloom.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorking
· 12-11 12:00
It's a bit too idealistic. Is Solana's stability enough to overthrow traditional finance?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4745f9ce
· 12-11 11:57
Hmm... sounds good, but can it really beat traditional finance, or is it just another overhype?
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon42
· 12-11 11:53
If Solana can really be this powerful, there won't be so many complaints about "the network crashing again" every day... But on the other hand, the on-chain settlement speed truly can't compete with traditional finance. Once Solana is truly stable, it's not too late to boast.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leaker
· 12-11 11:53
NGL, Solana's ambition is pretty bold, but honestly, for on-chain liquidity to truly catch up with Nasdaq? We’ll have to wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 12-11 11:52
ngl this sounds nice on paper but... remember when everyone said eth would flip trad finance? health factor goes south real quick when liquidity dries up. not financial advice but watch those collateral ratios before betting the farm on solana's infrastructure holding up under actual load. been there, lost that.
There's a bold vision being thrown around lately: imagine Solana becoming so powerful that when you're eyeing a token like FWD trading on both Solana and NASDAQ, you'd instinctively choose the on-chain version. Why? Better liquidity, faster settlement, lower fees—everything traditional markets struggle with.
That's the ultimate goal some folks are pushing for. Not just competing with centralized exchanges, but going head-to-head with legacy financial infrastructure itself. It's ambitious, sure, but that's exactly where this space is heading—making blockchain rails the obvious choice over traditional finance plumbing.