The foundation: Fully Homomorphic Encryption. Think computation on encrypted data without ever decrypting it. No cleartext moments. No attack surface.
What makes this compelling isn't just the cryptography—it's the philosophy. In most systems, encryption is a shield you lower when you need to actually *use* data. ZAMA's betting on a future where you never lower it at all.
That's not incremental improvement. That's architectural reimagination.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockDetective
· 7h ago
This whole homomorphic encryption system, to put it simply, is a complete overhaul of the rules of the game. In the past, updates were just patches and fixes; ZAMA directly says there's no need to decrypt, it runs entirely in an encrypted state. Impressive.
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugee
· 12-11 12:46
I've really not heard of many projects that can truly implement fully homomorphic encryption. Is ZAMA's move really serious?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 12-11 12:37
Damn, this is the real black technology, never decrypt? Calculate directly on ciphertext? This idea is brilliant.
---
Fully homomorphic encryption sounds too idealistic. Can it really be implemented, or is it just another concept hype?
---
No hype, no blackening. If ZAMA can truly achieve this, the traditional security architecture should indeed be overthrown.
---
Wait, what does never decrypt mean? Won't user experience be compromised?
---
Rebuilding the architecture? Sounds impressive, but I just want to know how the performance actually is...
---
Finally, someone is not just patching things up but directly changing the game rules, absolutely
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperer
· 12-11 12:31
Fully homomorphic encryption sounds amazing, but can it really become widespread?
---
Always not decrypting? If that can be achieved, it would be incredible. Privacy would finally be saved.
---
Rebuilding the architecture sounds awesome, but I wonder how the performance will be...
---
Wait, does this mean there's no longer any possibility of plaintext leaks? I find that a bit hard to believe.
---
It feels much more advanced than the current patchwork solutions. Finally, someone is doing the right thing.
---
But speaking of which, when will this technology actually be implemented? Probably another five years to wait.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOn
· 12-11 12:27
The entire homomorphic set is truly unbeatable. Never decrypting means directly changing the approach—it's not about patching but about overthrowing and starting over.
ZAMA's security architecture? It's fundamentally different. They're not patching vulnerabilities—they're eliminating exposure entirely.
The foundation: Fully Homomorphic Encryption. Think computation on encrypted data without ever decrypting it. No cleartext moments. No attack surface.
What makes this compelling isn't just the cryptography—it's the philosophy. In most systems, encryption is a shield you lower when you need to actually *use* data. ZAMA's betting on a future where you never lower it at all.
That's not incremental improvement. That's architectural reimagination.