European automakers are pushing back hard against Brussels' latest industrial push. What's the fuss about?
The EU wants to boost local manufacturing—think electric vehicles and solar tech stamped "Made in Europe." Sounds patriotic, right? But here's the twist: car companies are warning this could actually *slow down* the EV transition. The proposed regulations would mandate a minimum percentage of components sourced domestically. Manufacturers argue this adds cost, limits supply chain flexibility, and might make EVs less competitive globally.
So we've got a classic tension: protectionism versus market efficiency. Brussels wants industrial sovereignty. Carmakers want to keep production lean and affordable. Who wins? Probably neither, if the rules get too rigid. The EV rollout needs speed and scale—not bureaucratic bottlenecks.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainMelonWatcher
· 12-11 19:52
Once again, the same story: regulators want to "manufacture in Europe," but end up pushing the costs directly up... what happened to the promised affordable EV?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBard
· 12-11 19:50
It's the same old story again. The EU wants to localize, but ends up choking themselves. LOL
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 12-11 19:47
It's the same old trick again. Protectionism can't stop market laws. The EU's move is just shooting themselves in the foot.
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGn
· 12-11 19:47
It's that protectionist approach from the EU again... It will really backfire. With costs rising, how can EVs continue to compete?
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurker
· 12-11 19:39
Nah, this is a typical EU move again... Want sovereignty, but end up trapping themselves.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 12-11 19:39
It's the same old protectionism strategy. Basically, the EU wants to position itself, but ends up shooting itself in the foot.
The more regulations, the more expensive it gets. Can't European bureaucrats do the math on this arithmetic problem?
Betting heavily on domestic supply chains, but in the end, EVs still have to compete on price with Chinese-made vehicles. How to compete?
They just want to take their time, no rush anyway.
Supply chain flexibility is gone, costs have increased, and ultimately consumers pay the price. This wave of regulation is a form of self-castration.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeaf
· 12-11 19:30
It's that same protectionist approach again, really funny. The EU insists on localization, but it ends up hindering the development of EVs, a classic case of policy backfire.
European automakers are pushing back hard against Brussels' latest industrial push. What's the fuss about?
The EU wants to boost local manufacturing—think electric vehicles and solar tech stamped "Made in Europe." Sounds patriotic, right? But here's the twist: car companies are warning this could actually *slow down* the EV transition. The proposed regulations would mandate a minimum percentage of components sourced domestically. Manufacturers argue this adds cost, limits supply chain flexibility, and might make EVs less competitive globally.
So we've got a classic tension: protectionism versus market efficiency. Brussels wants industrial sovereignty. Carmakers want to keep production lean and affordable. Who wins? Probably neither, if the rules get too rigid. The EV rollout needs speed and scale—not bureaucratic bottlenecks.