Big move coming on the AI front—word is there's an executive order in the works to override state-level AI regulations. The argument? Keep it federal, keep it unified.
Someone threw out a wild take: forget 'Artificial Intelligence,' should've called it 'Supreme Intelligence' from day one. Catchy, but maybe a bit too on the nose.
The real tension here isn't about branding though. It's about who dominates this space long-term. Right now it's shaping up like a two-horse race: the US or China. Whoever locks down AI infrastructure, compute power, and regulatory frameworks first might just control the next decade of tech evolution. And yeah, that includes everything downstream—DeFi automation, on-chain AI agents, decentralized compute. Stakes are high.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OffchainWinner
· 9h ago
Federal unification? Or are they about to choke our states again... I’m all too familiar with this trick
---
Supreme Intelligence... sounds like some tech billionaire bragging in a bar, haha
---
Basically, whoever controls computing power first wins. If the US is slow this time, they might really get taken out
---
I'm quite looking forward to DeFi+AI agents; it feels like the real breakout point
---
The US-China AI arms race is escalating? Looks like the next few years on-chain will be interesting...
---
An executive order has arrived, another round of division... are the states still allowed to operate?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFries
· 10h ago
Coming back to centralization again? The federal unified framework sounds like it’s going to stifle innovation...
USA vs China, this game is indeed big. The one who locks down computing power and infrastructure first wins.
Supreme Intelligence... Haha, it’s a bit arrogant, but not as much as the imagination space of on-chain AI agents.
DeFi is about to be transformed by AI; we need to keep a close eye on this wave.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdrop
· 10h ago
The competition for AI infrastructure essentially boils down to the future discourse power. Whoever seizes this piece of the pie first—China or the US—will win.
Federal centralized regulation can indeed accelerate progress, but the real breakthrough depends on the development of on-chain computing. The potential in DeFi automation is enormous.
Supreme Intelligence haha, a bit arrogant, but the name definitely sounds more exciting than the old-fashioned AI.
View OriginalReply0
FundingMartyr
· 10h ago
Federal unified regulation? So it's about centralization again, this trick is old news.
---
Supreme Intelligence... sounds like a cover for great power games; the real issue is who first masters computing power and frameworks.
---
DeFi automation, on-chain AI agents... wake up, the US is still bickering, China has already laid out plans long ago.
---
Basically, it's fear of being cut off; betting on federal regulation now is actually a bad move.
---
This wave truly concerns a decade-long pattern; it's no longer just a technical issue.
Big move coming on the AI front—word is there's an executive order in the works to override state-level AI regulations. The argument? Keep it federal, keep it unified.
Someone threw out a wild take: forget 'Artificial Intelligence,' should've called it 'Supreme Intelligence' from day one. Catchy, but maybe a bit too on the nose.
The real tension here isn't about branding though. It's about who dominates this space long-term. Right now it's shaping up like a two-horse race: the US or China. Whoever locks down AI infrastructure, compute power, and regulatory frameworks first might just control the next decade of tech evolution. And yeah, that includes everything downstream—DeFi automation, on-chain AI agents, decentralized compute. Stakes are high.