A lawmaker recently reminded the administration that winning the AI race isn't just a tech flex—it's about whose principles end up coding the next hundred years.
Senator Cruz drew a parallel to the internet's early days, arguing that whoever leads in artificial intelligence will basically write the rulebook for how society evolves. His pitch? Keep regulations minimal, let innovation breathe, and don't let competitors dictate the terms.
The stakes are pretty clear: this isn't about algorithms alone. It's a values game dressed up as a tech competition.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonRocketman
· 18h ago
Ah, basically whoever grabs the AI launch window will control the equation of social evolution, with escape velocity directly embedded into the code.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 18h ago
Wow, now that's real! It's not about who has more GPUs, but whose values can last longer.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 18h ago
Basically, whoever controls AI will hold the right to speak for the future—that's beyond question.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 18h ago
Basically, it's just trying to shake off regulation. I'm tired of hearing this kind of rhetoric.
A lawmaker recently reminded the administration that winning the AI race isn't just a tech flex—it's about whose principles end up coding the next hundred years.
Senator Cruz drew a parallel to the internet's early days, arguing that whoever leads in artificial intelligence will basically write the rulebook for how society evolves. His pitch? Keep regulations minimal, let innovation breathe, and don't let competitors dictate the terms.
The stakes are pretty clear: this isn't about algorithms alone. It's a values game dressed up as a tech competition.