A major discussion platform has taken its fight to Australia's highest court, challenging the nation's controversial under-16 social media restriction. The company argues that being swept into this regulatory framework violates fundamental rights to political discourse. The legal challenge targets both the ban itself and the platform's classification under it. This move highlights growing tensions between tech platforms and government oversight, as regulators worldwide grapple with how to balance youth protection against expression freedoms in digital spaces.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DogeBachelorvip
· 6h ago
Here we go again, the government really is getting more and more lenient... You can't play if you're under 16, I really can't understand this logic.
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFundvip
· 7h ago
Here we go again, with this set of talking points... When has the platform ever truly considered user freedom of speech?
View OriginalReply0
ChainDoctorvip
· 7h ago
Here we go again, the old debate of political correctness vs. free speech... Australia really can't hold it together this time.
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrendervip
· 7h ago
Here we go again, these things never end... The government bans websites and takes it to court. Do children really need this much protection? What about freedom of speech?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)