A U.S. Senator just dropped a bombshell about Meta's new Louisiana data center project. The facility is set to consume three times the electricity of the entire city of New Orleans. Let that sink in.
The veteran politician didn't mince words, calling out the tech billionaire behind the project and urging citizens to push back against this level of resource concentration. This kind of energy demand raises serious questions about infrastructure sustainability.
For crypto folks, this hits close to home. We've been defending proof-of-work mining against energy FUD for years, yet here's a centralized tech giant planning a facility that dwarfs most mining operations. The irony is thick.
Data centers—whether for AI training, cloud services, or blockchain validation—are becoming the new battleground for energy politics. As Web3 infrastructure scales, these debates will only intensify. The difference? Decentralized networks distribute this load globally, while tech monopolies concentrate it in single locations, creating regional strain.
The backlash isn't just about kilowatt-hours. It's about who controls critical infrastructure and how that power gets deployed. Sound familiar? That's the exact conversation we've been having in crypto since day one.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
airdrop_huntress
· 9h ago
Haha, this is really a joke. Meta’s electric-consuming monster still dares to shift the blame to us miners.
Now you've been caught, the centralized giants consume three times the electricity of New Orleans but no one cares, and our hash power is about to be criticized.
The truth about energy politics is like this—whoever is bigger is the boss.
I've said it long ago, decentralization is the way to go.
Meta’s data centers vs. the entire city’s electricity supply—what a comparison... and still have the face to talk about sustainability.
Why can big corporations do whatever they want with rules? That’s exactly why we need Web3.
Now even the senators can’t stand it anymore—Meta, you’ve gone too far.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKing
· 9h ago
Haha, Meta's energy-consuming monster has been confirmed, and our crypto圈 has been blamed for it for years
Truly hypocritical
Fleks signals vs centralized vampires, choose one
This is real energy waste, New Orleans was drained dry
Web3 is the real cure, brother
A U.S. Senator just dropped a bombshell about Meta's new Louisiana data center project. The facility is set to consume three times the electricity of the entire city of New Orleans. Let that sink in.
The veteran politician didn't mince words, calling out the tech billionaire behind the project and urging citizens to push back against this level of resource concentration. This kind of energy demand raises serious questions about infrastructure sustainability.
For crypto folks, this hits close to home. We've been defending proof-of-work mining against energy FUD for years, yet here's a centralized tech giant planning a facility that dwarfs most mining operations. The irony is thick.
Data centers—whether for AI training, cloud services, or blockchain validation—are becoming the new battleground for energy politics. As Web3 infrastructure scales, these debates will only intensify. The difference? Decentralized networks distribute this load globally, while tech monopolies concentrate it in single locations, creating regional strain.
The backlash isn't just about kilowatt-hours. It's about who controls critical infrastructure and how that power gets deployed. Sound familiar? That's the exact conversation we've been having in crypto since day one.