Following top traders can be highly profitable, but the risk of being wiped out is also very real. My approach is to set up a multi-address synchronization trigger mechanism — not blindly following a single address, but only automatically copying when multiple promising wallets buy in simultaneously within a set time window.



The benefits of this method are: firstly, it greatly reduces the chance of being misled by large traders, as it’s difficult for someone to manipulate multiple independent accounts at once; secondly, it helps filter out truly consensus-based trading signals, rather than impulsive moves by an individual.

I’ve personally seen someone use this strategy to bottom out a certain coin, riding it from the lows all the way near the highs, with returns nearly 30 times higher. Of course, choosing the right addresses to follow is also crucial — they need to be skilled traders, not just lucky enough to catch a quick surge. Most importantly, set a stop loss for yourself — no matter how strong the signal, don’t go all-in.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCriervip
· 12h ago
Multiple address linkage indeed prevents pump-and-dump schemes, but brother, you overlooked one issue—those "truly capable" traders are also learning from each other. Maybe they're all following the same big whale, and in the end, everyone gets liquidated together. 30x leverage sounds exciting, but what about probability theory? Instead of waiting for multiple signals to synchronize, it's better to analyze on-chain data and observe actual holding costs—that's hardcore. Going all-in is indeed not recommended, but following multiple addresses can also fall into another trap—buy-in windows don't match at all. By the time your signals align, you've already missed the boat. The question is, how to define "true strength"? If a big V keeps adding to their position even after a 30% drop, is that real strength or a gambler's mentality?
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplantvip
· 12-12 09:57
This approach still has some merit. Multi-address synchronization can indeed reduce the risk of being exploited, but to be honest, I've heard too many cases like 30x before. The people who can truly replicate it... uh.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0vip
· 12-12 09:56
Multiple address linking is indeed clever, but to be honest, it still depends on your judgment to pick the right people. A 30x return sounds great, but the key question is whether that guy ended up losing it back later.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrapevip
· 12-12 09:55
If I had known about this move earlier, I wouldn't be stuck in this deep hole of losses now. Watching all of you enjoy 30x returns, I blindly followed a big V at that time and got wiped out with nothing left.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifiervip
· 12-12 09:53
ngl the multi-sig trigger thing sounds good in theory but... statistically improbable someone's not gaming this already. like, how many "independent" wallets are actually independent? requires further auditing tbh. also 30x? that's the kind of number that makes me verify three times before believing it. anyway, stop all-inning, that's just asking for a rug.
Reply0
GweiWatchervip
· 12-12 09:36
I've thought about this multi-address linkage logic, but how many reliable wallets can really be synchronized and taken action on? That's inherently difficult. To put it nicely, it's about reducing the risk of being wiped out, but really it's a gamble that these wallets aren't fooling around. The 30x story is always the most attractive, but that probability... Cutting losses is a good point, but most people who go all-in haven't even considered this aspect.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)