The ZK track hasn't been as eye-catching lately. After a wave of market enthusiasm, it has gradually fallen silent. However, some projects are still quietly making efforts—Brevis is such a team.



In mid-November, Brevis released the ProverNet white paper, and this move is quite noteworthy. The core idea is to build a decentralized ZK proof computing power market. Previously, most solutions involved a single vendor supplying computing resources, but ProverNet introduces a bidding mechanism with multiple provers participating. This market-oriented structure not only reduces computing costs but also makes proof services more competitive.

Although the popularity of ZK has a cyclical nature, Brevis's exploration and innovative ideas at the technological level are worth paying attention to. The iteration of this type of infrastructure often demonstrates its strength during industry cooling periods.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-75ee51e7vip
· 7h ago
Decentralized prover bidding logic is indeed innovative, but how much can it actually reduce costs? The market cooling down actually reveals who is genuinely working hard. Brevis is doing well in this wave. ProverNet seems interesting, but I’m not sure how it will actually be implemented. ZK technology has lost some of its buzz, but the progress in infrastructure is still worth following. The competition in the computing power market sounds good, but I’m worried it might just become a new scheme to cut the leeks. Innovations during these quiet periods are often the real deal, unlike during market hype when there are all kinds of PPT coins. More prover participation in bidding feels like拆Monopoly, the idea is good. Projects still pushing during the silent period show they’re not just riding the hype. I need to check out the ProverNet white paper, but everyone’s tired of centralization-driven cost reduction now. Brevis keeps a low profile while doing things; unlike some projects that boast every day, I appreciate this attitude.
View OriginalReply0
StealthMoonvip
· 17h ago
ZK is indeed a bit cold right now, but Brevis's recent move is still somewhat interesting. Can multi-prover bidding really break the monopoly? --- Honestly, the decentralized proof market sounds good, just not sure if ProverNet can truly be implemented. --- The industry’s slow period actually reveals who is genuinely working, unlike those who only jump on trending topics. --- Reducing computing power costs sounds good; it feels like this is what ZK should look like. --- Brevis is low-key, but I need to think more about this decentralized prover logic. --- Another project claiming to change things. How far it can go still depends on whether there are real applications to support it later.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 17h ago
gas fees have risen again... ProverNet's bidding mechanism is essentially aimed at reducing costs, but how many gwei is truly worth it to get on the chain? Brevis is indeed sharpening its sword, but I'm more concerned about whether the miner tips from these decentralized provers will become another hidden cost. No matter how hot ZK technology is, it can't escape the cycle curse. Those quietly working behind the scenes often have no voice even in a bear market. Decentralized computational power markets sound good, but I have no idea how much gas it costs to perform cross-chain proof calls... Just thinking about it gives me a headache. More prover bidding to cut costs? I believe it, but I need to do the math myself to see how much the gas cost for running a single transaction can actually decrease.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmilingvip
· 18h ago
Really, ZK is now just a cyclical game. After a hot streak, no one pays attention anymore. But Brevis’s decentralized prover bidding logic is quite interesting; breaking the monopoly of a single vendor really hits the pain point. Only when computational power costs come down can there be real competition. --- The cooling-off period is actually a time to see who is truly working, as most projects have already gone silent. --- Wait, doesn’t this bidding mechanism potentially lead to new centralization issues? The logic seems a bit convoluted. --- Honestly, the ZK track is getting a bit dull now. I hope Brevis isn’t just another project that opens champagne after releasing a white paper. --- The multi-prover competition model is good; just not sure if it will change once implemented.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)