The latest Fed dot plot looks like a dovish signal, but a closer look reveals the actual situation — only two rate cuts by 2026, another one in 2027, and no change in 2028. The market’s previous expectation of massive stimulus? Gone. Along with that, the so-called Bitcoin super cycle theory mentioned by some is also invalidated.



These days, the Fed’s $40 billion Treasury bond purchases are seen by many as balance sheet expansion. In reality, it's far from that. This is called RMP (Repurchase Market Program) operation, which is not the same as QE (Quantitative Easing). QE actively injects liquidity into the market to stimulate; QT tightens liquidity; while RMP is just a temporary “liquidity supplement”—with only one goal: to maintain bank reserve adequacy and prevent reserve shortfalls, hedging against the end-of-year fiscal TGA funds adjustments and tax collection window, not expanding market liquidity.

The Fed has made it clear: by April 2026, the RMP scale will stay high to cope with the Treasury’s new debt issuance; once seasonal disturbances subside, bond purchases will decline rapidly. The true determinant of market liquidity, however, depends on whether the SLR rule loosens, whether banks are willing to expand their balance sheets, when the Treasury’s TGA account will replenish, and how quickly the Fed’s ON RRP (Overnight Reverse Repurchase Program) reduces.

The next two key data points to watch are: the November non-farm payrolls report on December 16, and the November CPI data on December 18. If CPI does not rebound, the Fed’s future easing policies will be in question; conversely, it points to a continued tight balancing act.

#数字资产生态回暖 $TNSR
ETH0.02%
BTC-0.31%
COAI-7.89%
TNSR-0.15%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-1a2ed0b9vip
· 12-15 02:34
Talking about a super cycle again? Wake up, friend, the Federal Reserve has already revealed its hand.
View OriginalReply0
ETHReserveBankvip
· 12-14 00:43
Here we go again, a bunch of people are scared by 40 billion, unable to distinguish between RMP and QE. This is the information gap.
View OriginalReply0
DaisyUnicornvip
· 12-12 10:59
Oops, another "dovish signal" has been exposed... RMP does not equal balance sheet expansion, gotta explain clearly to those little flowers who are being led by the rhythm. Wait, is the super cycle theory just invalidated with a snap of the fingers? I knew it, the ones who hype it the most are often the first to break. I’ve noted the two data points in December; it’s only a real savior if CPI doesn’t rebound, otherwise we’ll just keep playing the tight balance game. Whether banks are willing to expand their balance sheets is the real key, much more than superficial articles... If the SLR rule really loosens, the liquidity landscape can truly change.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuckvip
· 12-12 10:58
Once again, it's the same dovish pretense. The real knives are in the details, yet RMP and QE are deliberately muddled together by a bunch of people.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCatvip
· 12-12 10:58
Oh no, this RMP has been mistaken for QE by a bunch of people again, hilarious. The slightest detail can make a huge difference. --- The super cycle theory now sounds like a joke; anyone who believes it is doomed. --- So, those two data points in December are the real game-changers, CPI is the key. --- The issue of liquidity still depends on whether banks decide to expand their balance sheets; the Federal Reserve has been laying the groundwork for so long, but it's actually quite powerless. --- RMP temporary liquidity injections are not the same as real money printing; the market’s understanding of this is truly poor. --- Only two rate cuts in 2026? How can this trade be made? Looks like we’ll have to wait it out.
View OriginalReply0
SillyWhalevip
· 12-12 10:54
Another operation as fierce as a tiger, but upon closer inspection, it's a 50-50 split on the spot.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetScholarvip
· 12-12 10:53
The super cycle theory has really been proven wrong this time. The Fed's dot plot is just dampening everyone's enthusiasm.
View OriginalReply0
rug_connoisseurvip
· 12-12 10:37
Oh no, falling for the tricks again. Thought there would be a big liquidity injection, but it’s just RMP after all. --- The super cycle theory sounds like a joke now, I tell you. --- 400 billion just to fool us into thinking they’re expanding the balance sheet? Wake up, everyone. --- The key still depends on CPI; these two data points are the real determinants. --- RMP is just a patch; how can anyone still see it as a savior? Haha. --- Only two rate cuts in 2026? That pace is a bit slow. Are you worried about your holdings? --- The SLR rule is the real hidden big boss. No one mentions this. --- No rebound means there’s hope; if it rebounds, keep fighting hard. Simple and straightforward.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)