2025-12-12 10:42:02

On-chain transactions and related matters, whenever a project with high attention flashes a few good results, someone immediately follows suit. And then? Traders' orders are "seen through," follow-on orders flood in, and finally, everyone dances together into liquidation. Just think about those addresses that are searched manually, various insider trading cases—this phenomenon is all too common.

But now there is a different approach. Brevis and Aster's technical collaboration uses ZK zero-knowledge proofs to "hide" traders' orders, truly protecting traders' privacy. With orders invisible, no one can track your positions from public information, breaking the vicious cycle of "being followed → liquidation." This is very meaningful for traders who want to operate discreetly.

ASTER-3.14%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

POAPlectionist

· 12-13 06:10

Honestly, this ZK solution does seem to address the old problems, but how many traders can actually use it? Most people still have to have their pants pulled down. --- Privacy protection has been talked about for years. Will Brevis and Aster finally be implemented? I'm half skeptical and half hopeful. --- Breaking the dead cycle of reckless liquidation is indeed difficult, but the transparency of on-chain data can't be changed. No matter how advanced the technology is, it still depends on whether the ecosystem accepts it. --- Low-key operation? Ha, as long as you're making money, someone will want to copy your trades. Privacy is just delaying the discovery. --- The core of this technology is order hiding, but the trading results still need to be on-chain. Won't they just be exposed eventually? --- I've been following ZK solutions for a while, but I haven't seen a truly reliable plan that can protect large positions in practice. --- Good news, but the problem is most traders don’t need such complexity. On the contrary, small retail investors need privacy protection more. --- To put it simply, privacy and on-chain transparency are inherently opposed. Using ZK is just finding a middle ground—it’s a band-aid, not a cure.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 12-12 11:12

ngl this ZK privacy thing sounds nice on paper but... how many failed txs we talking before the ordering actually hides? 每次隐藏订单都得跑ZK proof 这gas费得多恐怖啊

Reply0

RugDocDetective

· 12-12 11:09

Ha, finally someone remembers about privacy. Those whale addresses that were exposed earlier are really impressive. If ZK technology can truly be applied, there's nothing to do about the hype coins, but it still depends on whether Aster is reliable.

View OriginalReply0

DustCollector

· 12-12 11:09

It should have been like this a long time ago; the feeling of being repeatedly exploited is truly uncomfortable. --- ZK privacy sounds good in theory, but how many people can actually use it? --- Haha, now those copy traders must be stunned. --- Privacy is privacy, but I'm just worried about new vulnerabilities being introduced again. --- Hiding orders is indeed satisfying, but will the gas fees become ridiculously high? --- Finally, someone thought of this. The previous number of forced liquidations from FOMO is countless. --- It still feels like treating the symptoms rather than the root cause; greedy people will be chased even with privacy. --- This approach is very friendly to retail investors. At last, they can breathe a sigh of relief.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 12-12 11:09

Hmm, this ZK privacy solution sounds good, but how many traders can actually use it? --- Another privacy project, why does it always seem to stay in an ideal state? --- Low-key operation is indeed necessary, but the prerequisite is that this system is really reliable, let's not have another failure. --- Finally, someone is seriously trying to solve the problem of being tracked and liquidated. Looking forward to the actual implementation. --- Honestly, there's no absolute privacy on the blockchain. No matter how advanced ZK is, it can't bypass the transparency of the chain itself. --- This is the kind of thing that should be considered, much more reliable than constantly promoting some air project. --- Privacy transactions definitely have a market; the key is whether Brevis and their team can truly deliver. --- It's called privacy in a nice way; in a harsh way, it's just avoiding regulation. Understand? --- That part about following the trend to liquidation was really heartbreaking. Finally, there's a way to break free from this vicious cycle. --- This approach seems more practical than defending against MEVBOT. Worth paying attention to the upcoming developments.

View OriginalReply0

GigaBrainAnon

· 12-12 11:05

Wow, finally someone is working on privacy. The previous "order manipulation" tactics were really disgusting. If ZK technology can really be applied here, the arbitrageurs will have to settle down for a while. But to be honest, how reliable are the Brevis teams? The logic of following trends has never changed; it all depends on who can withstand the beating. Good privacy protection is actually quite crucial; I don't want to be doxxed to death.

View OriginalReply0

RadioShackKnight

· 12-12 11:03

Wow, this is true privacy protection. Finally, someone has figured this out.

View OriginalReply0

MetamaskMechanic

· 12-12 10:46

This thing called zk has been hyped up for so long, and now there's finally some real substance. Privacy transactions are indeed necessary.

View OriginalReply0