Solana Ecosystem MetaDAO Innovation "Ownership Tokens": How On-Chain Markets and Legal Structures Address DAO Challenges

【Crypto World】At the Solana Breakpoint conference, MetaDAO co-founder Proph3t shared an interesting idea—using “ownership tokens” to realize true project ownership on-chain.

Rather than the traditional DAO voting mechanism, MetaDAO employs a different logic. First, in terms of governance and market oversight, there are only 2 to 4 proposal cycles per year, such as major events like funding rounds or new token issuances. But participation here is not based on voting weight; instead, it involves direct trading—token holders express their views through market behavior. This approach sounds much simpler.

More importantly, it features innovative legal structural design. Proph3t mentioned that founders will package and transfer intellectual property rights to an on-chain entity. The clever part is—if the project succeeds or is acquired in the end, all proceeds automatically return to the token holders. Founders can’t take all the benefits alone, and rug pulls are effectively prevented from the source.

Proph3t emphasized that this model directly addresses several pain points of traditional DAOs: the lack of genuine legal protections and unclear ownership transfer. “Ownership tokens,” combined with transparent on-chain market mechanisms and legal constraints, give crypto projects real, tangible security.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 11h ago
Damn, this is what a proper DAO should look like. The voting mechanism is already outdated; replacing it with market behavior? Making trades to express opinions is more authentic than any governance vote. But then again, does the legal system really recognize the transfer of IP to on-chain entities? Especially in some countries... Wait, financing and new coin issuance are only two to four times? Isn't that number too conservative? What if unexpected events happen?
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisservip
· 11h ago
Wait a minute, isn't this cutting down the cumbersome voting process of DAO and letting the market speak directly? It sounds quite satisfying, but the question is, can retail investors truly influence decisions through trading, or will it ultimately be the big players calling the shots again?
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 12h ago
So, basically, using trading to replace voting? This logic sounds pretty wild. It feels more like removing the complexity of a DAO, but can this really prevent whale manipulation?
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperervip
· 12h ago
Hey, wait a minute. How can we ensure that the IP transfer isn't exploited? Do the founders really have such integrity?
View OriginalReply0
UncleWhalevip
· 12h ago
OMG, it's another thing that sounds perfect but may not be feasible in practice... However, replacing voting with trading is indeed a bold move, directly letting the market speak.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapistvip
· 12h ago
Haha, really another "revolutionary" DAO solution, this time with legal structure support? I just want to ask, can this IP package transfer really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)