#美国证券交易委员会推进数字资产监管框架创新 The recent statement by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul Atkins signals an important development: traditional financial markets are preparing to migrate to blockchain.
What does this shift in regulatory attitude mean? Market interpretation is clear—RWA (Real-World Asset Tokenization) is no longer a distant future but has become a direction for financial development in policymakers' eyes. In other words, this track indeed holds many opportunities.
But reality is always complex. For RWA to truly take off, several hurdles must be crossed:
**Ownership verification and information transparency of underlying assets**—you need to know that the assets backing the on-chain tokens are real.
**User access issues**—what is an appropriate threshold to protect investors while attracting participants?
**Liquidity dilemmas**—even if assets are on-chain, can trading convenience keep up?
Frankly, this isn’t something that can be solved overnight. The balance between innovation and risk requires careful calibration, and regulators, project teams, and users all need to find their respective positions. The future of RWA indeed looks promising, but the prerequisite is to resolve these fundamental issues first.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpAnalyst
· 7h ago
Relaxation of regulation = the night before harvesting. This wave of RWA hype does have some substance, but don't rush to get on board, brothers.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 12-13 23:36
The consultation records show that the clinical manifestations of this wave of RWA really require regular follow-up. Transparency defects, liquidity indicators not meeting standards... Relying solely on policy expectations and injections cannot cure this ailment.
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippa
· 12-12 13:40
RWA sounds good, but to be honest, we still have to wait for regulation to truly take effect. Right now, it's all just armchair theorizing.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 12-12 13:38
Regulatory friendly signals are a good thing, but I'm more concerned about whether these RWA projects dare to be truly transparent. They all speak nicely, but the key is whether there is real gold and silver backing assets...
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsCriminal
· 12-12 13:33
Listen, listen, if what Paul Atkins said can really be implemented, then my years of paper hand trading will be saved, haha.
The reality is that RWA still needs to wait, and issues like asset confirmation and liquidity are unavoidable pitfalls. Regulators have good intentions, but execution might be another story.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDay
· 12-12 13:25
Sounds good, but I'm afraid this is just the regulatory authorities making big promises again. It might really take five or ten years to actually materialize...
#美国证券交易委员会推进数字资产监管框架创新 The recent statement by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul Atkins signals an important development: traditional financial markets are preparing to migrate to blockchain.
What does this shift in regulatory attitude mean? Market interpretation is clear—RWA (Real-World Asset Tokenization) is no longer a distant future but has become a direction for financial development in policymakers' eyes. In other words, this track indeed holds many opportunities.
But reality is always complex. For RWA to truly take off, several hurdles must be crossed:
**Ownership verification and information transparency of underlying assets**—you need to know that the assets backing the on-chain tokens are real.
**User access issues**—what is an appropriate threshold to protect investors while attracting participants?
**Liquidity dilemmas**—even if assets are on-chain, can trading convenience keep up?
Frankly, this isn’t something that can be solved overnight. The balance between innovation and risk requires careful calibration, and regulators, project teams, and users all need to find their respective positions. The future of RWA indeed looks promising, but the prerequisite is to resolve these fundamental issues first.