Tried something interesting: feed your own tweets to an LLM and ask whether it makes logical sense. If it validates most of what you've written, that's when you realize—the model might soon replace you.



But here's the catch: they lack genuine creativity and real foresight. Novel ideas don't emerge from pattern matching alone.

We're heading toward an era where we can finally prove sentience through objective methods. That's the real inflection point.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractRebelvip
· 20h ago
Haha, I knew it. LLMs are just advanced parrots, do you really think they can replace the human brain? Dream on. --- So pattern matching can generate creativity? Then my dog can also write code. --- Validating logic ≠ having ideas; these are two completely different things. --- The key is—who defines "objective proof"? That itself is problematic. --- Creativity—no matter how smart the machine is, it can only follow templates. It will never guess the black swan that the human mind comes up with. --- Wait, this logic is a bit reversed... If your validation logic is rigorous, does that mean it can replace you? Wouldn't that imply that people with poor logic are safer? --- Forget it, it still takes human irrationality to break through.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmesvip
· 12-15 00:21
Haha, isn't that just saying AI can replicate logic but can't produce real creativity? Feels a bit overthought. Just take my tweets and run a model test, and it only parrots back, can't come up with a single new idea. Pattern matching sounds impressive, but in reality, it's just a sophisticated parrot, dreaming of surpassing human creativity? When perception is objectively proven that day, the internet will explode... worth looking forward to. The LLM replacement theory is shouted every day, but AI with no new ideas is useless no matter how strong it is—this is the ceiling.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalistvip
· 12-13 00:51
Haha, this logic is interesting... If it can truly be proven objectively that perception is absurd --- Pattern matching can do only so much, but human imagination is also declining, to be honest --- So the core is that creativity still relies on the human brain? Then we're temporarily safe --- Wait, if the model can validate your logic... does that mean your logic itself is predictable? This reflection is a bit disgusting --- As for proving perception... if there's a real way, it would overturn everything, but I think it's still far away --- Just scaring people, models can't replace innovative thinking, at most they can do the crappy work --- Where is the turning point? Why can't I see it yet
View OriginalReply0
GamefiEscapeArtistvip
· 12-13 00:47
Haha, the model says my logic is clear, so I really need to reflect on that. Creativity, really, can't be handled by pattern matching. There's a huge gap. Perceiving objectivity? That's a pretty extreme idea.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoFortuneTellervip
· 12-13 00:40
Haha, isn't this just saying that you'll eventually be destroyed by what you wrote yourself? A bit ironic. No matter how grand the logic, it can't change one thing—the machine just doesn't have that flavor. The day perceptual ability can be objectively proven, maybe then we're truly doomed. Feeding your tweets to the model, it sounds like looking into a mirror. Creativity, to put it simply, is just making things up beautifully. LLM, you're not it. The scariest thing isn't being replaced, but the moment you can't tell the difference at all. But on the other hand, those who realize this have already won half the battle.
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamervip
· 12-13 00:39
Haha, doesn't that mean AI can only parrots, and the real creativity still depends on humans? Pattern matching can generate copy, but it can't come up with the next world-changing idea. The key still depends on who can break through the existing framework. The day perception can be proven... will be the real interesting beginning. The replacement theory is back again, but when it comes to creativity, AI is still far behind.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSellervip
· 12-13 00:29
Ha, what does this logical validation prove? We haven't really been replaced yet. Pattern matching has been outdated for a long time; creativity is something a model can never fully master. Are you drawing another pie chart? The real turning point should have come already. LLMs can verify your logic, but that doesn't mean they understand you. Perception can be proven? Let's first solve the creative problem. This line of thinking is a bit like self-comfort... It would be great if it were that simple. Humans possess things that models can't learn; don't overthink it.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSellervip
· 12-13 00:21
Haha, this logic has some substance, but it also feels like self-comforting. Wait, true creativity has never been something machines can freeze instantly. LLM validating my ideas? That means I haven't thought wild enough.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)