Vanguard's quantitative equity chief takes a skeptical stance on Bitcoin, arguing it remains fundamentally speculative in nature rather than functioning as a productive asset. According to John Ameriks, the leading asset manager's analysis, Bitcoin behaves more like a collectible item—comparing it to a trendy plush toy—lacking the income-generating or cash-flow mechanics that define traditional investments.
This perspective highlights the ongoing debate within institutional finance circles about Bitcoin's role in portfolios. While supporters argue for Bitcoin's store-of-value proposition, critics from major financial institutions question whether it qualifies as a genuine asset class given its absence of yield or underlying cash flows.
The commentary underscores the tension between retail adoption narratives and institutional skepticism, particularly from established players managing trillions in assets. For traders monitoring institutional sentiment, such viewpoints from major financial figures remain influential in shaping broader market confidence and regulatory discussions around digital assets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainHolmes
· 15h ago
Toy metaphor is really clever, but this guy just stands there talking without any concern; he's managing trillions and still dares to say Bitcoin has no cash flow?
---
The early wealthy are always the ones who like to deny the game rules for later entrants, classic case
---
Hold coins with confidence; their doubts are the best signal
---
Vanguard's set of arguments comes around every year, wake up everyone
---
Wait a minute, if assets have no returns, then how do we count gold? Double standards aren’t this double
---
Institutions are really getting anxious, starting to use toy metaphors now
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 12-13 01:54
Blind box? Please, Bitcoin is even worse than a blind box. At least with a blind box, you can still get something out of it...
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 12-13 01:50
What are you yelling about? Blind boxes and Bitcoin are essentially the same... they're both about gambling for popularity.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 12-13 01:42
Let's issue the coin first, anyway, blind boxes can be traded.
Vanguard's quantitative equity chief takes a skeptical stance on Bitcoin, arguing it remains fundamentally speculative in nature rather than functioning as a productive asset. According to John Ameriks, the leading asset manager's analysis, Bitcoin behaves more like a collectible item—comparing it to a trendy plush toy—lacking the income-generating or cash-flow mechanics that define traditional investments.
This perspective highlights the ongoing debate within institutional finance circles about Bitcoin's role in portfolios. While supporters argue for Bitcoin's store-of-value proposition, critics from major financial institutions question whether it qualifies as a genuine asset class given its absence of yield or underlying cash flows.
The commentary underscores the tension between retail adoption narratives and institutional skepticism, particularly from established players managing trillions in assets. For traders monitoring institutional sentiment, such viewpoints from major financial figures remain influential in shaping broader market confidence and regulatory discussions around digital assets.