#以太坊行情技术解读 【The Dual-Engine of Value: Balancing Stable Storage and Dynamic Creation in the Ecosystem】



In the long-term game of the crypto market, an increasingly clear and intriguing question emerges—$BTC as digital gold is indeed stable, but where does the growth momentum of the entire ecosystem come from?

Recently, many projects have been exploring this direction. For example, in the GameFi sector, efforts are underway to convert users’ gaming time and enthusiasm into actual on-chain assets. This is not just simple token mining; instead, it involves a barrier-free asset leasing mechanism that allows global players to participate at zero cost, while simultaneously accumulating real on-chain reputation and community governance rights within the game.

**The two-layer structure makes it very clear:**

On the storage layer, assets like $BTC carry the total value and foundational trust of the ecosystem—this is the base. But a solid base still requires upper-layer business activities to drive growth. The application layer (such as various GameFi ecosystems) is continuously creating value through diversification, injecting fresh vitality into the entire ecosystem—active users, transaction volume, and richness of ecological applications.

**How exactly does the flywheel form:**

Players enter with zero capital barrier, driving activity → quality games are iterated continuously due to more players → community governance becomes more meaningful → ecosystem tokens are supported by practical application scenarios → attracting more developers and players. Once this cycle starts running, the overall value of the ecosystem can expand from storage consensus to creative vitality.

Tokens play a core role in this process—they are not just financial assets but also proof of power and efficiency. Holders can participate in resource allocation decisions, gain priority in tasks and airdrops, and these are practical functionalities—not just pure speculative expectations.

**Realistic reflection:** Future ecosystem competition may not only depend on value storage capability, but also on who can better activate application ecosystems and maintain user engagement. Stable value storage is just the foundation; continuous value creation is the engine for long-term ecosystem growth.

What’s your view? At the current stage, should the ecosystem focus more on deepening storage consensus or accelerating application innovation?
ETH-4.56%
BTC-2.08%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearEatsAllvip
· 12-16 05:53
GameFi zero-cost participation sounds good, but honestly, how many projects can actually run successfully?
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 12-15 23:36
Zero-threshold participation sounds good, but can on-chain data speak? What exactly are the TVL and daily active users? I've seen quite a few theories about the GameFi flywheel, but can you count the ones that have actually succeeded? This theoretical framework itself is fine, but a risk warning—using tokens as proof of stake can easily evolve into a Ponzi scheme; it depends on the smart contract audit report. The dual drive of storage and application is correct, but according to the latest on-chain statistics, the retention rates of most GameFi projects are actually frighteningly low. Don't be fooled by activity levels. I want to ask, what is the source of income for this zero-cost leasing mechanism? Is it creating value out of thin air or squeezing other parts?
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxAddictvip
· 12-14 05:10
Zero-cost participation? Sounds good, but who will fill this loophole? In the end, isn't it still retail investors who take the fall?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThricevip
· 12-13 06:30
The whole Flywheel theory sounds good, but has GameFi really taken off?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 12-13 06:30
Entering with zero cost sounds very attractive, but very few projects can truly run the flywheel effectively.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 12-13 06:28
The concept of the flywheel is well explained, but how many can truly get it off the ground? Most are still just air.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemistvip
· 12-13 06:20
Participating at zero cost sounds great, but how many GameFi projects can actually get off the ground?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 12-13 06:14
Zero-cost participation sounds good, but who will foot the bill?
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 12-13 06:01
To be honest, the zero-threshold rental model in GameFi sounds good, but very few projects are actually able to run the flywheel effectively.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)