Regarding the implementation of Clause 6-3, some voices have pointed out that this approach may infringe upon free speech rights. The more fundamental issue is whether it is fair to punish the entire user base based on the actions of a few disabled channels—a "one-size-fits-all" approach. How the platform balances cracking down on violations and protecting users' fundamental rights is indeed worth deep consideration.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MindsetExpander
· 23h ago
Another one-size-fits-all approach? Isn't that overkill...
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 12-13 08:47
One-size-fits-all really gets on my nerves. Why should the majority bear the cost for the mistakes of a few?
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinator
· 12-13 08:44
A one-size-fits-all approach is just lazy governance; the platform simply doesn't want to genuinely solve the problem.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 12-13 08:29
This all-or-nothing approach isn't just about panic selling during market fear; it's smashing the entire market just to clear out a few bad debts.
Regarding the implementation of Clause 6-3, some voices have pointed out that this approach may infringe upon free speech rights. The more fundamental issue is whether it is fair to punish the entire user base based on the actions of a few disabled channels—a "one-size-fits-all" approach. How the platform balances cracking down on violations and protecting users' fundamental rights is indeed worth deep consideration.