Recently, there has been frequent discussion about Lighter's FDV valuation, with the market generally talking about the $1B or $2B range. But have you noticed that rarely do people report higher figures? There's an interesting behind-the-scenes phenomenon here.
On one hand, the odds in certain prediction markets may have informational biases; on the other hand, many investors may not yet fully understand the project's backers' backgrounds and technical implementation pathways. From a fundamental perspective, the project's positioning within the industry, the profile of the funding parties, and the competitiveness of the core product—all point to a possible systemic undervaluation in the market.
Looking at it from another angle, if more people recognized the capabilities of the participating institutions and the development team, the discussion about the valuation ceiling could be entirely rewritten. The current consensus price might just be a temporary market valuation rather than a true reflection of the fundamental value.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashBrownies
· 19h ago
Honestly, the $1-2B valuation is indeed too conservative; the market hasn't really reacted to this wave.
To be honest, I only recently dug into Lighter's background, and the financing side's strength is indeed impressive.
This is the information gap—those who understand are probably already building positions, haha.
Market reactions are always lagging; the breakout will only happen when big influencers start promoting.
It seems that those entering now are betting on subsequent cognitive upgrades, with the fundamentals supporting the strength.
It's hard to say what the ceiling is, but it definitely isn't just a $2B story.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatcher
· 19h ago
To be honest, a valuation of $1B-$2B is outrageous. No one has thoroughly investigated the strength of the investors behind it. What is this all about?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 19h ago
Really, those $2B guys didn't do their homework at all. The backer behind Lighter would be known to be worth more than this once you look into it.
Recently, there has been frequent discussion about Lighter's FDV valuation, with the market generally talking about the $1B or $2B range. But have you noticed that rarely do people report higher figures? There's an interesting behind-the-scenes phenomenon here.
On one hand, the odds in certain prediction markets may have informational biases; on the other hand, many investors may not yet fully understand the project's backers' backgrounds and technical implementation pathways. From a fundamental perspective, the project's positioning within the industry, the profile of the funding parties, and the competitiveness of the core product—all point to a possible systemic undervaluation in the market.
Looking at it from another angle, if more people recognized the capabilities of the participating institutions and the development team, the discussion about the valuation ceiling could be entirely rewritten. The current consensus price might just be a temporary market valuation rather than a true reflection of the fundamental value.