A notable case has emerged from court filings: an heir to the Hermès fortune placed inherited shares across three Swiss banking institutions, trusting the guidance of Eric Freymond, a Swiss wealth manager he'd worked with for nearly two decades. What followed was unexpected—the shares simply disappeared. The incident raises serious questions about asset custody and the risks of relying on traditional banking systems to safeguard substantial holdings. For anyone managing significant portfolios, whether through conventional or digital channels, the case underscores a harsh reality: even established, long-standing relationships with financial institutions don't guarantee security. It's a reminder that institutional trust, while sometimes necessary, carries its own vulnerabilities.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Lonely_Validator
· 12-16 00:02
Wow, 20 years of trust just gone like that? That's really incredible, how ironic.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 12-14 22:14
Oh my god, Hermes heir's stock is gone just like that? 20 years of trust relationship collapsing in an instant, hilarious. This is the real "trust crisis."
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 12-14 17:09
Twenty years of relationship and I still couldn't hold on to a bunch of stocks—that's what they call institutional trust.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidator
· 12-14 17:09
Oh wow, now that's a real bombshell... Twenty years of trust gone just like that, and assets evaporated...
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShaman
· 12-14 17:05
Now it's all gone. Twenty years of trust wasted; it disappeared just like that. Traditional banks are truly exceptional.
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionist
· 12-14 16:58
Damn, twenty years of relationship and it still ends up with problems? How absurd is that?
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlock
· 12-14 16:58
actually... this is exactly the kind of case that exposes why we can't just hand-wave away trust assumptions in traditional finance. two decades of relationship means nothing when custody architecture is fundamentally broken, yeah?
Reply0
SmartMoneyWallet
· 12-14 16:50
Even a 20-year relationship can go awry, which is the vulnerability of traditional finance... Once the fund flow gets out of control, even the biggest names are useless.
A notable case has emerged from court filings: an heir to the Hermès fortune placed inherited shares across three Swiss banking institutions, trusting the guidance of Eric Freymond, a Swiss wealth manager he'd worked with for nearly two decades. What followed was unexpected—the shares simply disappeared. The incident raises serious questions about asset custody and the risks of relying on traditional banking systems to safeguard substantial holdings. For anyone managing significant portfolios, whether through conventional or digital channels, the case underscores a harsh reality: even established, long-standing relationships with financial institutions don't guarantee security. It's a reminder that institutional trust, while sometimes necessary, carries its own vulnerabilities.