#加密生态动态追踪 $ZBT this project has had a pretty serious collapse. The official website was hacked, and all funds embedded in the financial management feature were stolen. The project team's attitude afterward was even more outrageous—they straightforwardly said that even if they had the ability, they wouldn't compensate, which is basically an admission of guilt.
The performance on the candlestick chart also clearly illustrates the issue. It dropped from 0.75 all the way down to 0.08, a decline of over 89%. The market's judgment is already very clear. For cryptocurrencies with this level of risk, the bearish reasons are indeed sufficient.
If you're paying attention to trading strategies for altcoins, this case serves as a cautionary example—project security and the official's post-incident attitude are often better indicators of risk than candlestick charts.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainHolmes
· 12-19 05:46
It's the same old trick again, the official website gets hacked and they refuse to admit it, truly unbelievable.
---
I've seen through ZBT from the start; with such a hardcore attitude, it's no wonder they don't run away.
---
An 89% drop isn't enough to make some people learn their lesson.
---
I just want to ask, is there still anyone willing to touch this kind of project? What's the point?
---
The project team's statement "No ability, but no loss" is more honest than any candlestick chart.
---
That's why I only look at security audits and not whitepapers.
---
Getting beaten by the official once makes it clear; it's more effective than any analyst.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuy
· 12-19 05:06
It's the same old trick, the project team passing the buck is the most impressive
---
Damn, an 89% drop, how many people lost out?
---
Say you won't compensate? Can this still be called a project team? Just a pure scammer
---
I already noticed something was off with this coin before; the official website's security is so poor yet they dared to launch
---
This is how clone coin pools are, risks are written all over, the price of greed
---
Falling from 0.75 to 0.08, I can only say you deserve it, who told you to mess with this stuff
---
The project team's attitude is the biggest red flag, much more honest than a K-line chart
---
I've noted down the ZBT case; in the future, check how the official team shifts blame before evaluating a project
---
Financial management feature was hacked? This design itself is full of vulnerabilities
---
Fallen so much and still people want to buy the dip? Are you really brave or just really stupid
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 12-18 22:17
Another scammer, it's rare to see project teams so bold, directly coming out and refusing to pay? Haha, that's why I now even have to wear a gas mask when looking at altcoins.
Fallen from 0.75 to 0.08, the retail investors are about to learn another lesson.
It’s better to watch the project team’s attitude than to watch the K-line.
Another string of names added to the loss list...
The official website being hacked and still so calm, truly impressive.
Next time someone tries to sell me on a new coin’s prospects, I’ll just throw this case at them.
The project team’s attitude really refreshed my understanding of "shamelessness."
An 89% drop—that’s the price of trust.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHands
· 12-16 09:01
Another classic "project team disappears into thin air" script... ZBT has really outdone itself this time. The official website was hacked, and they still claim they won't compensate. How shameless can they get?
Wait, dropped from 0.75 to 0.08? My friend apparently got caught holding this coin before... Ah, forget it. For projects like this, it's better to clear them from the list.
Trading altcoins is all about reliability. ZBT now falls into the category of "capable but won't compensate," basically declared invalid.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 12-16 08:59
Another classic script of "It's not our fault, you deserved it," truly brilliant.
---
Admitting defeat without compensation—this guy's courage is impressive.
---
Fell from 0.75 to 0.08—how many people lost out... it’s painful to watch.
---
The official website gets hacked and they still shift blame—I've learned this move.
---
The project team's attitude is the biggest signal of a decline, more real than any technical analysis.
---
Next time someone touts a certain clone coin, just ask the project team if they dare to compensate—one sentence to spot a scammer.
---
89% of the decline is all blood and tears accounts...
---
That's why I only stick to major coins—living is good, why play in this fire pit?
---
The early risers have already run, everyone left is just faith recharged.
---
Funds stolen with no compensation—be honest and open, this guy.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher1
· 12-16 08:58
89% decline, yet the project team still stubbornly refuses to admit defeat. This move is absolutely brilliant... It directly serves as a vivid cautionary tale for later entrants.
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdropper
· 12-16 08:57
Another case of a hopelessly bad project that refuses to admit fault, ZBT is truly unbelievable.
It was directly cut from 0.75 to 0.08, the drop is ridiculously huge.
The project team still dares to act arrogantly and say they won't compensate; this attitude is more heartbreaking than the explosion itself.
The water in altcoins is too deep; next time you see a team spouting nonsense like this, just run.
Once the project's security collapses, all K-line charts are just floating clouds. Remember this lesson.
Fell 89%, and are people still buying the dip? Their courage is truly remarkable.
The official website was hacked, all funds are gone. Who will be responsible? The ecosystem is now just a joke.
The phrase "if you have the ability, don't compensate" is basically a blunt way of saying "we don't care at all," absolutely
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 12-16 08:40
Another classic case of "we are powerless" scapegoating, this attitude is more disgusting than the technical issue itself.
ZBT's move is a suicidal operation, dropping from 0.75 to 0.08 is no coincidence; the market had already sentenced it to death.
Shitcoins are like this—watching how they shift blame is often more accurate than looking at the chart. A reliable team wouldn't be so bold as to say they won't compensate.
By the way, is anyone still buying the dip at 0.08...
The official website was hacked, and they still announced no compensation? Laughable, this broken project is beyond saving.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 12-16 08:35
Here comes another project team saying "We are also helpless," truly incredible
---
89% decline, the official website was hacked and they still stubbornly deny it. This wave definitely deserves a note
---
Not willing to compensate? Just forget it. Anyway, it's clear this thing is unreliable
---
That's why I never touch coins with poor official attitudes; candlestick charts are just superficial
---
The ZBT incident shows you that how the project team shifts blame can be more revealing than price fluctuations
---
Is there anyone still buying at 0.08? Absolutely ridiculous
---
Once security is compromised, even a rebound in the candlestick chart is pointless
---
If the official dares to confront so aggressively, it clearly indicates there are hidden problems
---
Shanzhai coins are like this; choosing the wrong project team means everything is over
#加密生态动态追踪 $ZBT this project has had a pretty serious collapse. The official website was hacked, and all funds embedded in the financial management feature were stolen. The project team's attitude afterward was even more outrageous—they straightforwardly said that even if they had the ability, they wouldn't compensate, which is basically an admission of guilt.
The performance on the candlestick chart also clearly illustrates the issue. It dropped from 0.75 all the way down to 0.08, a decline of over 89%. The market's judgment is already very clear. For cryptocurrencies with this level of risk, the bearish reasons are indeed sufficient.
If you're paying attention to trading strategies for altcoins, this case serves as a cautionary example—project security and the official's post-incident attitude are often better indicators of risk than candlestick charts.