MicroStrategy CEO: If you're optimistic about Bitcoin, holding shares can outperform BTC's growth.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】An interesting viewpoint is circulating — the CEO of MicroStrategy has stated that if you are long-term bullish on Bitcoin, you might as well consider MicroStrategy’s stock. Why? Because, from a design logic perspective, MicroStrategy’s stock is aimed at outperforming Bitcoin in the long run.

This is based on a clear investment thesis: rather than directly holding BTC, it’s better to leverage the growth potential of a listed company. As a company heavily invested in Bitcoin, MicroStrategy’s stock performance theoretically should reflect a dual benefit: the company’s own appreciation plus Bitcoin’s appreciation.

Of course, this view also reflects institutional confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term prospects — to claim that stocks can outperform BTC, one must first believe that Bitcoin itself has a stable long-term growth expectation. Interestingly, this also serves as a sample of how institutions allocate Bitcoin assets.

BTC0.01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DisillusiionOraclevip
· 12-19 20:38
Double returns sound appealing, but the risks are also doubled. Don't be fooled by the CEO.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpyvip
· 12-19 09:26
Well said, dual returns sound really attractive... but I always feel like this is just digging a hole for retail investors. Wait a minute, does the CEO really dare to say that? Why not just go all in on BTC? Dual returns sound great, but leverage is a double-edged sword; it can be just as harsh when prices fall. This logic is a bit like using A-shares volatility to bet on crypto market gains, it seems like they are increasing the risk. But on the other hand, the fact that institutions are so confident in their bets does indicate they still have long-term confidence. It's all a routine; the volatility of listed company stocks is actually even greater... I’d rather stick with my BTC. This is just the standard rhetoric institutions use to attract retail investors; wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91vip
· 12-19 04:04
Double returns sound good, but every institution uses this kind of pitch. The key is whether MSTR can truly outperform Bitcoin.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAOvip
· 12-18 15:19
The micro-strategy approach sounds good, but can it really double the wins? It still feels like betting that the company's operations won't run into problems.
View OriginalReply0
Degentlemanvip
· 12-16 23:49
It sounds like a classic case of nesting... Isn't it better to just buy BTC directly instead of adding an intermediary?
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictimvip
· 12-16 23:46
Double returns sound good, but can it really outperform BTC? It still feels more reliable to just HODL.
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardianvip
· 12-16 23:40
Dual returns sound good, but the logical loophole is quite big... Stocks still depend on company operations, what if MicroStrategy really crashes?
View OriginalReply0
MagicBeanvip
· 12-16 23:31
Double returns sound great, but can it really outperform BTC? I find this logic a bit unsettling.
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperervip
· 12-16 23:21
Dual returns sound good, but can MSTR really consistently outperform BTC? Stocks still depend on management, but crypto is just crypto.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 12-16 23:20
Double returns sound good, but isn't this just a leverage trick? The prerequisite for outperforming BTC is that MicroStrategy itself doesn't fall behind; even a slight operational risk could ruin everything.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)