[Crypto World] The Hyper Foundation recently proposed a noteworthy initiative on social media — officially confirming through validator voting that the HYPE tokens in the aid fund have been burned, and removing them permanently from circulating supply and total issuance.
There is a story behind this. The operation of the aid fund involves automatically converting transaction fees into HYPE during L1 execution. You might wonder, where is this fund now? The answer is a system address — similar to a zero address concept. This system address has a key characteristic: it has never held a private key controlling funds. In other words, even if one wanted to move this money, it would be mathematically impossible without a hard fork.
The logic of this vote is straightforward: validator votes “approve” mean agreeing to permanently burn these HYPE tokens. Since these tokens are already locked in a keyless system address, no on-chain action is actually needed. The real significance of this vote is to establish a binding social consensus — ensuring that future protocol upgrades will not attempt to access or unlock this address.
In simple terms, this clarifies a fact through community consensus and sets clear boundaries for future protocol governance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xLuckbox
· 12-19 22:22
Damn, this move really burned everything. Without the private key, it's completely over.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 12-19 01:37
Address without private key... This method is indeed ruthless, burning it completely.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 12-17 22:55
Address without private key... This move is a bit extreme. Should I really destroy it or just find a different way to lock it?
View OriginalReply0
SolidityJester
· 12-17 04:10
Keyless address... sounds like a complete dead end, this move is quite ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezer
· 12-17 04:10
Address without private key... This operation is truly brilliant, a real destruction solution
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 12-17 04:09
Address without private key... This is the "irreversible" on the chain, confirmed at the data layer and cannot be reversed, and still requires voting to reach consensus? Feels like stamping legal approval on technical details.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollector
· 12-17 04:03
This keyless address trick is brilliant; true "burning" has to be done this way.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_ptsd
· 12-17 04:00
I'm really tired of this set of destruction tricks in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 12-17 03:48
Really speechless, destroying a coin still requires voting confirmation? Probably just messing around with art.
Hyper Validator Voting: Interpretation of the HYPE Assistance Fund Burn Proposal
[Crypto World] The Hyper Foundation recently proposed a noteworthy initiative on social media — officially confirming through validator voting that the HYPE tokens in the aid fund have been burned, and removing them permanently from circulating supply and total issuance.
There is a story behind this. The operation of the aid fund involves automatically converting transaction fees into HYPE during L1 execution. You might wonder, where is this fund now? The answer is a system address — similar to a zero address concept. This system address has a key characteristic: it has never held a private key controlling funds. In other words, even if one wanted to move this money, it would be mathematically impossible without a hard fork.
The logic of this vote is straightforward: validator votes “approve” mean agreeing to permanently burn these HYPE tokens. Since these tokens are already locked in a keyless system address, no on-chain action is actually needed. The real significance of this vote is to establish a binding social consensus — ensuring that future protocol upgrades will not attempt to access or unlock this address.
In simple terms, this clarifies a fact through community consensus and sets clear boundaries for future protocol governance.