Stablecoins benchmarked as payment systems, Bitcoin competing with traditional assets—how does the industry view the market positioning of these two major assets?
【Crypto World】MicroStrategy co-founder Michael Saylor recently shared his views on the market positions of stablecoins and Bitcoin, offering an interesting comparative perspective.
In his view, the main competitors of stablecoins are not other crypto assets, but existing payment systems like Visa. As stablecoin technology is globally promoted and use cases expand, this competition will ultimately drive up the value of the US dollar — a logic worth pondering. In other words, the development of stablecoins is essentially helping to internationalize the dollar, rather than overthrow it.
Unlike the “payment competition” of stablecoins, Bitcoin follows a different path. Saylor believes that Bitcoin’s core value proposition is as a store of value, and its true competitors are traditional capital assets like gold and real estate. This positioning allows Bitcoin to break out of the “payment tool” framework and compete with the ways humans have accumulated wealth for thousands of years.
What’s interesting about this classification is that it divides the crypto asset ecosystem into two completely different tracks: one for payment innovation and one for value storage. Stablecoins and Bitcoin each have their own roles, and their competitors are entirely different. This differentiated positioning may be the reason why these two asset classes can coexist and develop independently.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenVelocityTrauma
· 12-18 07:46
Saylor's logic is clear: stablecoins are aimed at payment systems, while Bitcoin is the true digital gold... Each track plays to its strengths, and mutual non-interference can lead to a win-win situation.
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuth
· 12-18 07:43
Saylor's guy is still somewhat interesting. Comparing stablecoins to Visa is indeed a fresh perspective, but when it comes to the internationalization of the US dollar... the Federal Reserve might get quite nervous if they hear about it.
Stablecoins benchmarked as payment systems, Bitcoin competing with traditional assets—how does the industry view the market positioning of these two major assets?
【Crypto World】MicroStrategy co-founder Michael Saylor recently shared his views on the market positions of stablecoins and Bitcoin, offering an interesting comparative perspective.
In his view, the main competitors of stablecoins are not other crypto assets, but existing payment systems like Visa. As stablecoin technology is globally promoted and use cases expand, this competition will ultimately drive up the value of the US dollar — a logic worth pondering. In other words, the development of stablecoins is essentially helping to internationalize the dollar, rather than overthrow it.
Unlike the “payment competition” of stablecoins, Bitcoin follows a different path. Saylor believes that Bitcoin’s core value proposition is as a store of value, and its true competitors are traditional capital assets like gold and real estate. This positioning allows Bitcoin to break out of the “payment tool” framework and compete with the ways humans have accumulated wealth for thousands of years.
What’s interesting about this classification is that it divides the crypto asset ecosystem into two completely different tracks: one for payment innovation and one for value storage. Stablecoins and Bitcoin each have their own roles, and their competitors are entirely different. This differentiated positioning may be the reason why these two asset classes can coexist and develop independently.