【Crypto World】Anthony Pompiliano’s recent investment has attracted attention in the industry—this well-known Bitcoin advocate and fintech executive used his own funds to purchase shares of a company listed on the US stock market, amounting to over $1 million. This is not just an ordinary transaction but a genuine vote of confidence in his beliefs.
Interestingly, his compensation structure is designed this way. Pompiliano’s fixed annual salary is only $1, with 100% of his remaining earnings coming from equity incentives—these shares’ value is directly linked to whether the company’s stock price surpasses $15 per share.
The logic behind this approach is clear: the interests of founders and employees must be fully aligned. It’s not just about supporting the company verbally but betting real money on it. When a leader’s earnings are highly aligned with shareholders’ interests, all decision-making becomes transparent and pure. This “stakeholder” mechanism is rare in traditional enterprises but is common in Web3 startups and Silicon Valley advanced companies—using incentives to eliminate information asymmetry.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TommyTeacher1
· 12-21 13:00
Annual salary of 1 dollar... This guy is really all in, just talking without practicing is just a false show, this is what it means to have skin in the game.
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRiches
· 12-21 12:25
This guy is really gambling with his life, a $1 annual salary is indeed harsh
---
To put it bluntly, it's like binding himself to the stock price, either we all go to the moon together or we all perish together
---
Sounds inspiring, but think about how much pressure that puts on employees...
---
Web3 is like this, no matter how good the talk is, it’s better to see if the founder is willing to put their own money in
---
Why can't the bosses of traditional companies learn from this? Empty talk every day is the most annoying
---
Buying a ticket for a million dollars and having a salary of $1, this operation is indeed novel, but if it backfires, it would be disastrous
---
I calculated that if the stock price rises to $15, how much would he earn... a bit crazy, huh
---
The logic of shared interests is not wrong, the problem is that our ordinary employees' equity is worth only a few cents
---
The gambler temperament of this gentleman Pompliano is really strong.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancer
· 12-18 13:29
Annual salary of $1 haha, this is true all-in, unlike some CEOs whose visions are all just lies.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 12-18 13:29
This guy is really all in, earning only $1 a year—how much confidence does it take to pull off that move?
$1 a year? I don't believe he can survive, unless he's really turning things around with equity.
It's basically gambler's thinking, but to be fair, he's definitely better than those talkative CEOs.
Setting a target of $15? That's a bit low—shouldn't someone like this aim for ten times that?
View OriginalReply0
PerpetualLonger
· 12-18 13:29
Bottom-fishing for a million dollars is truly incredible, this is what I call faith-based accumulation, brother.
---
$1 annual salary? Fully vested equity? This guy is crazy, I like it.
---
Wait, a breakthrough at $15? This time there's hope, keep holding steady.
---
Basically, it's about pushing all chips in, I just want to see him make a killing.
---
This is true profit binding, short-term retail investors, take a good look.
---
Bottom-fishing for a million dollars, the bull market is really here, I’ve decided to add to my position one last time.
---
Brother, this move either soars to the sky or loses everything, I bet he can break through.
---
Only $1 salary relying on equity? This guy's brain is fine, he's too crazy.
---
Looking at this momentum, it feels like it's about to take off. Can we still get on board now, brothers?
---
Real money votes like this are a hundred times better than those mouthy talkers.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 12-18 13:22
An annual salary of $1... This guy has really bet his life on it, unlike some mouthy CEOs who talk about vision every day but secretly cash out behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategist
· 12-18 13:22
An annual salary of $1, 100% relying on equity? It's either a true believer or in a real hurry. The $15 price point is set aggressively enough, revealing the mindset of the chips.
---
Spending millions to buy stocks yourself is definitely more convincing than empty talk. But the real test is whether you can endure the risk release period.
---
Profit binding sounds sexy, but probabilistically, most teams will still have disagreements during pullbacks. The pattern has formed; let's see if it can hold the support afterward.
---
The argument of a $1 salary always works well in fundraising PPTs, but in reality? Just look at the trading volume and chip distribution to see how many insiders truly believe.
---
It's interesting, but don't be blinded by the story. This kind of incentive mechanism often leads to more distorted short-term behaviors, doing anything to push the stock price.
---
The retail investors get excited when they see "CEO invests millions," but they don't realize this is a standard hype tactic. What really matters is the price at which he sells.
CEO votes with millions of dollars: How Pompiliano designs the "Together in the Same Boat" incentive mechanism
【Crypto World】Anthony Pompiliano’s recent investment has attracted attention in the industry—this well-known Bitcoin advocate and fintech executive used his own funds to purchase shares of a company listed on the US stock market, amounting to over $1 million. This is not just an ordinary transaction but a genuine vote of confidence in his beliefs.
Interestingly, his compensation structure is designed this way. Pompiliano’s fixed annual salary is only $1, with 100% of his remaining earnings coming from equity incentives—these shares’ value is directly linked to whether the company’s stock price surpasses $15 per share.
The logic behind this approach is clear: the interests of founders and employees must be fully aligned. It’s not just about supporting the company verbally but betting real money on it. When a leader’s earnings are highly aligned with shareholders’ interests, all decision-making becomes transparent and pure. This “stakeholder” mechanism is rare in traditional enterprises but is common in Web3 startups and Silicon Valley advanced companies—using incentives to eliminate information asymmetry.