"Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" faces a cold reception? The DeFi regulatory tug-of-war behind the banking industry's billion-dollar political battle

robot
Abstract generation in progress

[Crypto World] The advancement of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States has encountered new variables. The “Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act” originally had some bipartisan consensus, but now it seems progress may be delayed. Where is the problem? It mainly hinges on two points: first, how to regulate DeFi; second, whether stablecoins can have incentive mechanisms. Traditional banking industry is especially dissatisfied with the latter and is actively opposing it.

In December last year, representatives from both parties held a meeting, and the atmosphere was quite good, showing some hope. But don’t be fooled by the surface optimism; behind the scenes, the banking industry has already been planning—rumor has it they are planning to spend over $100 million to support pro-bank candidates. This money will ultimately flow into political activities during the early 2025 or even mid-2026 elections, with a clear goal: to use political pressure to gain regulatory concessions.

So, this is not just a policy dispute but also a battle of interests. Democrats may extend the negotiation cycle to balance various demands. The prediction market data remains relatively optimistic—there is a 77% chance that the bill will pass before 2027, but when exactly and in what form it will pass is still uncertain.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Layer2Observervip
· 12-20 22:56
The issue of banks pouring money to obstruct is basically just them protecting their own interests. But what's interesting is that DeFi is really hard to regulate; from the source code perspective, it's fundamentally difficult to define the responsible party. The market remains optimistic, but I really want to see what this bill will ultimately turn into—further verification is needed.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 12-18 14:50
The banking folks are getting desperate. Seriously, they’re throwing hundreds of millions of dollars just to shut us up. It’s hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemesvip
· 12-18 14:49
The banking industry playing this trick is just too expensive; buying votes is quite straightforward, huh.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Brovip
· 12-18 14:49
The banking industry is causing trouble again, throwing money to influence policies. Why can't they be controlled?
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorervip
· 12-18 14:38
The banking industry is up to its tricks again, this routine is getting really old...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)