[Crypto World] A recent research report presents some interesting data. Institutional investors are shifting their mindset; they are no longer fixated on short-term Bitcoin fluctuations but are instead applying traditional asset allocation logic to it.
The report makes a hypothesis: if Bitcoin’s market cap can reach one-third of gold’s, then by following this logic, the price of Bitcoin could surge to $1,420,000 by 2035. This sounds ambitious, but the underlying logic is based on traditional capital market models.
The most important recommendation is this—since Bitcoin’s expected return is relatively high and its correlation with traditional assets like stocks and bonds is very low, allocating 2%-5% of a portfolio to Bitcoin can actually reduce overall risk and improve portfolio efficiency. In other words, adding some Bitcoin isn’t necessarily gambling; it’s more like a new approach to balanced allocation. This shift from “speculating on coins” to “allocating coins” may signify the true maturity of institutional mindset.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 12-21 16:20
The institution entering the market is a good sign, but can that 1.42 million really be reached? It still feels like a conservative estimate.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 12-21 01:21
1.42 million? Wake up, now is the time to strategize.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTs
· 12-20 23:00
$1.42 million? Hold on, how is this number calculated? The assumption that one-third of gold is too optimistic.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHome
· 12-18 16:44
1.42 million? Wake up, everyone. The institutions are paving the way for retail investors to become the bagholders.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 12-18 16:39
wait, 142k by 2035? let me check the math... actually the model doesn't check out when you factor in real adoption curves, tbh
Reply0
gas_fee_therapy
· 12-18 16:37
Uh... 1.42 million dollars? That's such a magical number, do the institutions really think this way?
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 12-18 16:27
Oh no, 1.42 million USD? Based on my analysis, these institutions are now just disguising their coin hoarding behavior as "asset allocation."
Will it be realized only by 2035? Sounds nice, but in reality, they are quietly building positions now. Just look at the on-chain data of wallet addresses, and you'll see the psychology 101 of big players.
2%-5% sounds moderate, but actually it’s hinting that retail investors should get on board. Risk warning: This might be my personal speculation, don’t blame me if I predict a crash.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 12-18 16:25
$1.42 million? Haha, that number is still too far from me. Let's focus on managing the current holdings first.
Institutional investors re-evaluate Bitcoin: a shift from short-term speculation to long-term allocation
[Crypto World] A recent research report presents some interesting data. Institutional investors are shifting their mindset; they are no longer fixated on short-term Bitcoin fluctuations but are instead applying traditional asset allocation logic to it.
The report makes a hypothesis: if Bitcoin’s market cap can reach one-third of gold’s, then by following this logic, the price of Bitcoin could surge to $1,420,000 by 2035. This sounds ambitious, but the underlying logic is based on traditional capital market models.
The most important recommendation is this—since Bitcoin’s expected return is relatively high and its correlation with traditional assets like stocks and bonds is very low, allocating 2%-5% of a portfolio to Bitcoin can actually reduce overall risk and improve portfolio efficiency. In other words, adding some Bitcoin isn’t necessarily gambling; it’s more like a new approach to balanced allocation. This shift from “speculating on coins” to “allocating coins” may signify the true maturity of institutional mindset.