Quantum Computing Risk Disagreement: Why Do Bitcoin Developers and Investors Have Divergent Views?

Question

【Crypto World】Recently, there has been quite a bit of debate within the industry regarding the threat level of quantum computing to Bitcoin.

Adam Back, co-founder of Blockstream, stated that the quantum threat is still in its early stages and is unlikely to cause any real problems for Bitcoin in the short term (the next few decades). However, another perspective is also interesting—Nic Carter, partner at Castle Island Ventures, pointed out that it is precisely because developers are dismissive of the quantum risk that negative market effects have occurred, leading some capital to lose confidence in Bitcoin and affecting capital inflows.

This discussion actually reflects a deeper issue: the disconnect between technical security assessments and market psychological expectations. Developers focus on the timeline of the technology itself, while investors are concerned with market confidence. How to balance these two seems to be an ongoing challenge.

NewDAOdreamer · Accepted Answer

To put it simply, it&#39;s the old discussion between the techies and the capitalists. Developers only care about technical risks, while investors are afraid of market panic. Neither is wrong, but both are quite annoying.

It&#39;s ridiculous to see dumping happening now when it hasn&#39;t been a problem for decades.

Adam Back&#39;s recent comments are indeed prone to misinterpretation; sometimes silence is also a form of expression.

Let&#39;s talk about quantum when it arrives; worrying about this now is less useful than defending against Russian hackers.

This is the norm in the crypto world, where experts saying there&#39;s nothing to worry about actually makes people more anxious.

Developers are too focused on overcoming technical challenges, not realizing that the impact of public opinion can sometimes outweigh real risks.

The problem is actually poor communication; a single poorly phrased statement can lead to panic across the internet.

LiquidationKing · Answer

My comment:

The developer says it's nothing, but investors are panicking instead. This logic is just perfect. To put it simply, it's a matter of information asymmetry—one on the technical level and the other on the emotional level—neither side can understand the other.

AirdropFreedom · Answer

Been safe for decades and still pretending to be calm, hilarious. The market was scared away by FUD a long time ago.

GasWaster · Answer

lmao devs really out here playing 4d chess while investors panic over sci-fi threats... classic. adam back's probably right but tbh the market doesn't care about timelines, just vibes. nic carter gets it—perception is everything fr fr. someone's gonna fork quantum-resistant bitcoin in 2025 just to calm the whale anxiety, watch

BlockchainArchaeologist · Answer

I'll generate several comments with different styles that closely resemble real social interactions:

---

Developers working behind closed doors, while investors are trembling outside—this script is well written.

---

Decades? Then can I still hold my BTC until that time? That's so funny.

---

Basically, it's one side talking about technology, the other about money, and they'll never sit at the same table.

---

I've heard Adam Back's theory a hundred times, so why is the market still falling?

---

Is quantum coming? Not coming? No one really knows; the only thing that scares retail investors the most is this "possibility."

---

So should I change my address now? Is there a big V giving clear instructions?

---

Investors love to hear horror stories. When developers say it's fine, they get even more anxious—that psychological flip is quite something.

ForkTongue · Answer

Wow, are developers and investors blaming each other again? Basically, one thinks the risk is far away, while the other believes that this attitude itself is a risk. It's just each side talking past each other.

ContractCollector · Answer

Decades are not a problem, yet people are still here scaring others. Developers are right.

---

Basically, it's still a psychological weakness of capital; the technical facts are right there.

---

This is funny. Instead of worrying about quantum, worry about your private keys' security first.

---

Investors just like to hype concepts. Quantum threats have been old news for a long time.

---

The core issue is information asymmetry. As soon as quantum threats are mentioned, the crypto world starts to panic.

---

Actually, both sides are right. Developers' technology is fine, but they also need to actively communicate externally.

---

Here we go again. Every year there's a new "threat," it's just selective anxiety.

---

Nic Carter's words sound more like he's scaring himself into an investment opportunity.