The $LIGHT event this time showed me an interesting phenomenon - the traffic from top exchanges really surpasses that of Twitter.



I saw a lot of related discussions on Twitter, but the heat is actually quite average, with retweets and views not being exaggerated. However, the exchange plaza is different; any post can easily surge to tens of thousands or even over a hundred thousand views.

From a marketing perspective, this is truly a combination of precision and large volume. If someone wants to do targeted promotion, the concentration of platforms and user activity here is simply a chosen place. The deep traffic pool, strong user stickiness, and fast information dissemination—these advantages are indeed difficult to replicate on other channels.

As for those who have been taken advantage of, to be honest, I don't have much sympathy. Retail investors lack sufficient judgment, do inadequate due diligence, and follow the trend to chase high prices; these are all their own choices. The market is like this, with information gaps and cognitive differences always existing, and those who suffer are often participants who neither conduct in-depth research nor control risks. This is not an issue with the exchange, but a point for individuals to reflect on.
LIGHT1.45%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 12-23 02:50
The traffic at the exchange square is indeed terrifying; retail investors deserve to be played people for suckers.
View OriginalReply0
NervousFingersvip
· 12-22 17:56
The traffic at the exchange square is really outrageous, but it feels like the risks are also high. Once again, some people have been played for suckers; there are indeed many things to reflect on. The exchange is just an information lowland; whoever goes in gets sheared. The discussion heat on push is generally average, and the number of retweets is lacking. Retail investors should learn to analyze the market themselves and not always follow the trend to chase the price. A large amount of traffic leads to quick shearing of suckers. The top platforms have strong user stickiness, but to put it bluntly, this thing is just a harvesting machine. The information gap is indeed hard to guard against; it depends on how fast your reaction is. There are too many people following the trend, and this is the price to pay. Is being harvested really deserved, or does the platform have to take the blame? The square's traffic beats Twitter, but it also beats people's wallets, right?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivorvip
· 12-22 17:36
The exchange square is indeed a harvesting machine, and any retail investor that goes in has to lose some skin. Getting played is deserved; who told you not to do your homework? To put it bluntly, this is an information war, where the winner takes all. A post on the exchange gets over a hundred thousand views, while Twitter is as quiet as a ghost; the gap is so big? Retail investors will never learn to stop loss; it's their fate. Concentrated traffic means harsher plays; didn't see that coming?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)