Most tokens out there probably don't need to exist—but the ones backed by projects actually delivering value? Their fee mechanisms become critical. When there's genuine utility and transparent resource allocation, those token fees help keep the entire ecosystem running. That's the real difference between speculative noise and projects with actual legs.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AlphaLeakervip
· 12-22 18:51
Ultimately, it depends on how well the fee mechanism is designed. Some projects talk a lot about usability, but in reality, it doesn't amount to much.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologistvip
· 12-22 18:49
99% of shitcoins deserve to die, but a well-designed fee mechanism for a true utility token is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 12-22 18:38
The token fee mechanism of a reliable project is the real deal; those pure scamcoins truly deserve to die.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)