Recently, I saw the most professional analysis discussions about the LIT Airdrop. Interestingly, some of the previous commitments made by the project party seem to raise a question mark.

For example, the logic that points and tokens are positively correlated, and the guarantee that tokens will not be reclaimed after distribution—I'm a bit confused about how the project party operates this? It is said that there are quite a few wallets in the front row addresses that are indeed controlled by the project party, so do they just directly top up the addresses with more points and then filter the low guarantee addresses?

This issue is indeed worth considering. If the front-row address becomes a tool for the project party, then the fairness of the entire points system has been problematic from the very beginning.