Brevis ProverNet Token $BREV Detailed Explanation: The Evolution from Staking Validation to Native Gas Token

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【ChainWen】The Brevis team recently announced the complete economic design plan for the $BREV token. This token has three important roles: cost settlement for supporting zero-knowledge proof generation and verification, staking and incentive tools as network validators, and granting token holders governance rights over the ecosystem.

Just by looking at the validator aspect, you can feel the project’s design logic. Participating in validation requires staking BREV or participating through delegation. If the service agreement is violated, the stake will be directly confiscated. This mechanism ensures the security of the network.

The total supply of the token is set at 1 billion. In terms of distribution, 37% is allocated for ecosystem development to drive ecosystem growth, R&D investment, strategic partnerships, and initial market making; 32.20% for community incentives, covering various airdrop forms for validators, stakers, and community contributors; 20% is reserved for Brevis’s core developers and long-term contributors; and seed round investors receive 10.80%. In other words, nearly 70% of the tokens are for community and ecosystem incentives, while developers and investors each hold about 30%.

An interesting aspect of the technical roadmap is the iteration plan. Initially deployed on the Base network, after migrating to Brevis’s dedicated rollup, $BREV will be upgraded to a native Gas token, meaning the token will evolve from an incentive tool into a core component of the network infrastructure. Airdrop registration is now open.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugpullSurvivorvip
· 2h ago
37% ecosystem development + 32% community incentives, this ratio looks quite balanced... Just wonder if the actual token unlock will turn out to be another "surprise."
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictimvip
· 7h ago
Hi, can that confiscation mechanism really be enforced, or is it just empty talk...
View OriginalReply0
StableBoivip
· 17h ago
The confiscation mechanism is a good move, directly preventing validators from messing around with their ideas.
View OriginalReply0
GasGasGasBrovip
· 17h ago
The confiscation mechanism is effective; this is truly a means of restraint, unlike some projects that only shout slogans.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmervip
· 17h ago
The zk proof verification cost is really maxed out, and the penalty and confiscation mechanism is quite strict. However, I haven't fully understood how the 37% ecosystem development is allocated.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)