It's worth starting even with a small amount. About $100 to $200 is sufficient. Most people won't do it, so you can receive the benefits of that. When I talk about this, some people doubt, saying "It's strange that the distribution increases as the number of participants decreases" or "There might be some hidden agenda," but I don't think that small-minded. Ultimately, it's about everyone becoming wealthy together. Let's share good experiences together🌈
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MergeConflict
· 8h ago
Anyway, it's all gambling. Might as well bet a little and test the waters.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFreedom
· 8h ago
That's right, the cost of small-scale trial and error is low. Anyway, most people are hesitating, so those who get on the train first can reap much greater benefits.
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamer
· 8h ago
Really, with such a low threshold, you should give it a try. Anyway, most people are just watching.
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWallet
· 8h ago
Look at this set of claims... earning passively with just 100-200 USD? The lower the participation, the more the distribution? It all sounds like classic pyramid scheme logic, just packaged a bit more nicely.
It's worth starting even with a small amount. About $100 to $200 is sufficient. Most people won't do it, so you can receive the benefits of that. When I talk about this, some people doubt, saying "It's strange that the distribution increases as the number of participants decreases" or "There might be some hidden agenda," but I don't think that small-minded. Ultimately, it's about everyone becoming wealthy together. Let's share good experiences together🌈