2025-12-25 10:21:13

Many liquidity token holders are still on the sidelines before the rush. Interestingly, despite the heated discussions, no one has actually raised effective questions about the underlying technology of those launch platforms. The reason behind this is simple—it's difficult.

Sincerely invite any developers or technical teams to carefully examine the core technical architecture of a launch platform. This system is indeed more mature and cutting-edge compared to similar solutions. If you can find genuine flaws or functional obstacles, feel free to present evidence. Otherwise, the technical strength is right there.

Current market assessment: $2,000 level.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MoodFollowsPrice

· 10h ago

Really daring to talk big haha, let's see who dares to expose the truth If no one questions, it means either it's really strong or everyone is gambling $2000 for this price... need to wait and see No shortage of cutting-edge technology and face-slapping in the market If you dare to bring out evidence, I will be convinced

View OriginalReply0

SillyWhale

· 10h ago

Honestly, everyone is waiting for the next big thing. Who has actually gone through the code to check? Things that no one dares to question often have some substance, or maybe no one understands them haha. At the $2000 price point, it depends on how the subsequent volume performs. Being technically impressive is great, but ultimately, it has to be practical and profitable. This kind of "welcome to find bugs" invitation sounds very confident... Interesting. Here we go again, always talking about "cutting-edge maturity," the crypto circle's favorite phrase.

View OriginalReply0

PoolJumper

· 10h ago

To be honest, most people can't understand the code at all and just follow the hype. The technical architecture is indeed solid, but at a price of 2000 yuan... it's a bit unrealistic, right?

View OriginalReply0

HodlTheDoor

· 10h ago

Honestly, no one dares to really dig into the technology; either they don't understand or they pretend not to understand. As for technical audits, generally, people don't play around with them; it's just for the hype. Only two thousand dollars? That's still early. Everyone's hyping it up, but no one has actually verified it, which is very Web3. Let's see if any major auditing firms are willing to take on this job. If you really want to prove you're awesome, just throw out the code. Waiting and watching... waiting to see who can find the flaws. At this $2k price point, someone really needs to carefully check how good the technology is. After all this talk, it just shows that no one truly understands. Stop pretending. This set of statements is a bit like: Either you get on the train, or don't complain about technical issues.

View OriginalReply0