Science has been infiltrated at a curriculum level over the last couple of decades dumbing people down and preventing discoveries. They did this by teaching people not to trust correlation without cause, destroying all curiosity in the sector.
Science was always about noticing correlations, becoming curious and then looking to identify the cause to complete the science. These days, unless cause is instantly established, everything is dismissed.
You see this across all areas of science, whether it's archaeology, physics, astrology, astronomy. Everyone instantly dismisses new findings because there isn't a clearly identified cause simultaneously. This breaks the very meaning of science.
How can we know the cause before we complete the science? The correlation is what prompts the science. The cause is what completes the science. Dismissing correlation is extremely stupid.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Science has been infiltrated at a curriculum level over the last couple of decades dumbing people down and preventing discoveries. They did this by teaching people not to trust correlation without cause, destroying all curiosity in the sector.
Science was always about noticing correlations, becoming curious and then looking to identify the cause to complete the science. These days, unless cause is instantly established, everything is dismissed.
You see this across all areas of science, whether it's archaeology, physics, astrology, astronomy. Everyone instantly dismisses new findings because there isn't a clearly identified cause simultaneously. This breaks the very meaning of science.
How can we know the cause before we complete the science? The correlation is what prompts the science. The cause is what completes the science. Dismissing correlation is extremely stupid.