Have you ever proposed a DAO proposal? If you have, you might have experienced that exhausting feeling—community discussions go on endlessly, voting processes are lengthy, and fund allocations are repeatedly delayed. Ordinary token holders sit on the sidelines watching, and their initial enthusiasm for participation is drained away, to the point where they are too lazy to even vote. The entire DAO ecosystem falls into a vicious cycle like this.
Recently, Lista DAO implemented a governance upgrade to try to break the deadlock. They integrated on-chain voting with smart fund pool scheduling. What’s the effect? Proposals can be executed within an average of 48 hours. Submit a plan on Friday, and by Monday, funds are already flowing and projects are underway—this speed is comparable to the decision-making efficiency of traditional startups. Most importantly, ordinary token holders are no longer just spectators but become genuine decision-makers.
How is the underlying technology supporting this? Multi-signature wallets combined with on-chain automated execution scripts. Every fund operation undergoes smart validation, greatly reducing the risk of manual intervention and ensuring transparency. Next quarter, they also plan to launch cross-chain governance features, which will improve cross-chain asset scheduling efficiency by 30%-40%. When that happens, DAO governance will become even more flexible.
Speaking of rewards, this part is also well-designed. The community reward pool has already accumulated to around 500,000 USDC, distributed based on token holdings and activity levels. Participating in voting and submitting proposals will earn rewards—small token holders can also receive real money, which naturally boosts participation motivation. With this cycle, the community ecosystem will become increasingly active.
The ecosystem is following a modular approach, emphasizing composability. Governance modules can be freely combined, providing more options for different types of DAOs.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugResistant
· 01-10 11:56
48-hour execution? That sounds good, but it depends on how long it can be sustained afterward.
---
Both modular and cross-chain, it feels like every DAO is talking about these... The real key is whether they can be implemented.
---
A 500,000 USDC reward pool sounds tempting, but I'm worried it's just another scheme to trap retail investors.
---
Is there real money to be earned from voting? Maybe now there are more people interested than those genuinely caring about the ecosystem, haha.
---
Multi-signature scripts for automatic execution can significantly reduce risk, definitely better than some black-box operations.
---
Submitting on Friday and executing on Monday... If they can do this quickly, traditional DAOs should really reflect on themselves.
---
Have ordinary token holders truly become decision-makers, or are they just feeling more involved?
---
Cross-chain governance claims 30%-40% efficiency, but that number seems a bit exaggerated. We'll have to wait and see how it actually performs.
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidator
· 01-10 03:42
Results in 48 hours? If you can really do that, I would believe it. All those previous projects claimed the same.
Are there really that many reward shares? It depends on who takes the majority.
Smart verification sounds good, but I'm worried it still depends on a few big players calling the shots.
Cross-chain governance improves efficiency by 30%. Where does this data come from? It feels a bit fake.
Can small holders make money? I’d like to see if it’s real profit or just a pipe dream.
Just keep the process simple and straightforward, no need for all those flashy gimmicks.
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 01-07 20:50
Can it be executed in 48 hours? That's a bit exaggerated, isn't it? It still depends on the actual implementation results.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManager
· 01-07 20:47
Execute within 48 hours? Multi-signature wallets lower the risk factor so much, but the key is whether this logic can withstand a contract audit.
A reward pool of 500,000 USDC... how much can small holders get? It depends on what the on-chain data shows.
Cross-chain governance efficiency improved by 30%. This needs close attention, as I've seen too many vulnerabilities in cross-chain asset bridges.
Hold onto your chips and vote—that's the right way to open up.
Multi-signature architecture is indeed solid, but has the automated execution script been thoroughly tested? Details determine success or failure.
Value investing depends on the ROI of participation incentives. When calculated, this model is actually quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
MechanicalMartel
· 01-07 20:42
Execute within 48 hours? That speed is indeed outrageous. Finally, someone is seriously working on governance.
Have you ever proposed a DAO proposal? If you have, you might have experienced that exhausting feeling—community discussions go on endlessly, voting processes are lengthy, and fund allocations are repeatedly delayed. Ordinary token holders sit on the sidelines watching, and their initial enthusiasm for participation is drained away, to the point where they are too lazy to even vote. The entire DAO ecosystem falls into a vicious cycle like this.
Recently, Lista DAO implemented a governance upgrade to try to break the deadlock. They integrated on-chain voting with smart fund pool scheduling. What’s the effect? Proposals can be executed within an average of 48 hours. Submit a plan on Friday, and by Monday, funds are already flowing and projects are underway—this speed is comparable to the decision-making efficiency of traditional startups. Most importantly, ordinary token holders are no longer just spectators but become genuine decision-makers.
How is the underlying technology supporting this? Multi-signature wallets combined with on-chain automated execution scripts. Every fund operation undergoes smart validation, greatly reducing the risk of manual intervention and ensuring transparency. Next quarter, they also plan to launch cross-chain governance features, which will improve cross-chain asset scheduling efficiency by 30%-40%. When that happens, DAO governance will become even more flexible.
Speaking of rewards, this part is also well-designed. The community reward pool has already accumulated to around 500,000 USDC, distributed based on token holdings and activity levels. Participating in voting and submitting proposals will earn rewards—small token holders can also receive real money, which naturally boosts participation motivation. With this cycle, the community ecosystem will become increasingly active.
The ecosystem is following a modular approach, emphasizing composability. Governance modules can be freely combined, providing more options for different types of DAOs.