Recently discovered an interesting staking mechanism that made me reevaluate the lock-up strategies for governance tokens.



A project’s tiered staking just went live, and I carefully reviewed the rules. The design is quite interesting. Basically, locking for 3 months yields an annualized return of 12%, 6 months jumps to 18%, and if you lock for a full year, it skyrockets to 25%—plus an additional 1.5x governance voting power bonus.

How significant are these numbers? I did some quick math with 1000 tokens: compared to a 3-month lock, a 1-year lock earns an extra 400 tokens at maturity, which means a 40% higher return. This isn’t just a few percentage points; it’s a tangible difference you can see.

Even more impressive is the "renewal stacking" feature—if you don’t redeem at the end of the lock-up, you can continue to lock and earn an additional 5% bonus. Compared to those stable, unchanging staking yields, this long-term holding incentive clearly attracts more capital that truly believes in the project to come in and deposit.

I’ve already switched all my tokens to a 1-year lock-up. Honestly, for projects with real potential, long-term holding is the best investment logic, and this mechanism design simply amplifies the returns of that logic.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DegenMcsleeplessvip
· 01-08 02:24
The 5% subsidy renewal during the 1-year lock-up period is really attractive. This is true respect for long-term believers.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 01-07 23:53
A difference of 400 tokens isn't much; the key question is whether this mechanism can truly lock in long-term believers, or if it's just another prelude to cutting the leeks again?
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxietyvip
· 01-07 23:52
Wait, 25% annualized lock-up for 1 year plus doubled voting rights—this move is pretty clever, but it also depends on whether the project itself is reliable.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHuntervip
· 01-07 23:47
Locking it for a year is really worth it; the price difference of 400 tokens is no joke.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchormanvip
· 01-07 23:31
The 25% annualized figure is indeed tempting, but what truly matters is the 1.5x voting power, which is the real game for governance influence.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHerevip
· 01-07 23:28
25% annualized sounds good, but there aren't many who dare to go all in for a year. I also hesitated before jumping on board.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDivorcervip
· 01-07 23:26
Hmm, this renewal stacking still feels like a classic rug pull scheme—just lock the coins and it's all over.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)